FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
The Afghan war and its aftermath
Updated:May 19, 2015
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed
 
Meri Akhaari Jang: Afghanistan, Soviet Affuaaj kay Inkhala kay Baad (My Last War: Afghanistan after the exit of the Soviet Armed Forces from Afghanistan)  Translated by: Dr Najam ul Sahar Butt  Author: Makhmut Akhmetovich Gareyev  Review by: Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed  Published by: Jamhoori Publications 2015; Pgs: 127
 
The translation of this important book, written by a general of the Soviet Red Army, must be celebrated as a most important contribution by Dr Najam ul Sahar Butt. He has previously translated Russian literature and now a book of vital historical significance has been made available to Pakistani readers.
 
General Makhmut Akhmetovich Gareyev, who is of Tatar Sunni extraction, is a decorated veteran of the former Soviet Red Army. His long career in the army began in 1941 when as a young lieutenant he fought in World War II, escaping death by mere good luck. He was also the author of several books, holding a PhD in history and military science. He saw active service in World War II, escaping death during a pitched battle in 1943. Thereafter began a long career as an army officer. The present book under review focuses on the events from the time when he arrived in Kabul in 1989 as an adviser to President Mohammad Najibullah (1986 to 1992). He remained in Kabul in that capacity till 1991. By that time, the Soviet army had withdrawn from Afghanistan and only a few military advisers remained to help Najibullah. Gareyev was chosen to lead those advisers.
 
However, the book also takes up the overall Afghan conflict. We get a candid and balanced evaluation of what started taking shape after Muhammad Daud overthrew King Zahir Shah in July 1973 in a bloodless coup. Daud in turn was overthrown by the Afghan Communists in April 1978, only to be followed later by the Soviet Union sending troops to Afghanistan to help the beleaguered Communist regime in December 1979.
 
We learn that an oppositional Islamist movement had been evolving from the late 1960s. It intensified in 1975 when big demonstrations took place against Daud who was perceived as being pro-Soviet. Armed conflict followed and the Islamist leaders shifted to Pakistan where they began to be trained by the Pakistani security forces. Although the author does not go into the reasons for Pakistan’s involvement, in my own book, Pakistan: the Garrison State, I mention that Daud had revived the Pakhtunistan issue much to the chagrin of the Pakistan government, which at that time was headed by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. In fact the legendary Colonel Imam told me that in 1973 he had been sent to the US to receive training in armed insurgency with a view to helping the Islamic opposition.
 
From Gareyev we learn that in 1976 political parties such as the Jamaat-e-Islami Afghanistan and Majlis-e-Islamia Afghanistan were founded in Pakistan. Daud was overthrown in April 1978 by the Afghan Communists who had a strong presence in the Afghanistan armed forces. He describes the coup as a military one and not a popular people’s revolution. He is very candid in critiquing the coup because the objective conditions for carrying out radical reforms and ushering in socialism did not exist at all. Consequently, in the name of class war the land reforms and social reforms liberating women and other progressive changes did not rouse popular enthusiasm. On the contrary, the Islamist opposition’s campaign to portray them as un-Islamic and atheistic was successful. The author remarks that Afghan society has historically been known for rejecting intervention and reforms from the central government.
 
In principle Gareyev takes a stand against foreign powers intervening in the internal conflicts of countries and advises non-intervention to become a standard practice in international affairs. Nevertheless, he reiterates throughout his book that the Soviet Union could not have remained indifferent to political developments on its southern border in Afghanistan. He mentions that the decision to send troops to Afghanistan was debated by the leadership and there was hesitation to commit Soviet troops to that conflict but, given its close proximity, the view finally prevailed to send troops. The US-supported Afghan opposition in Pakistan was constantly interfering in Afghan affairs and supporting the insurgency against the Afghan Communists.
 
More interestingly, Gareyev deplores the attitude of the Soviet and Russian leadership, at that time headed by Mikhail Gorbachev, for not doing enough to support President Najibullah once the decision to withdraw had been taken. Thus, while the west and its allies, and of course Pakistan, continued to arm the opposition, the Soviet Union did not. That created an imbalance that greatly weakened Najibullah who, at that time, was working towards a modern government including one that gave representation to moderate Islamic forces. Gareyev remained constantly in touch with the Afghan president and did his best to advise him on how to make his troops more effective. The Afghan military, although demoralised and suffering from desertions, was by no means a spent force. It was sufficiently well-equipped and could have continued fighting until more favourable conditions would have been created for Najibullah to negotiate a peaceful transition to a government representing a broad spectrum of Afghan society. On the contrary he was displaced and brutally lynched to death in 1996 after being captured from the UN office in Kabul where he had taken refuge after being ousted from power.
 
Gareyev calls into question whether the Soviet Union was ever an empire. He argues that even the Czarist Empire never interfered with the culture and rights of its constituent nationalities while the Soviet Union provided equal rights to all those nationalities and regions that became part of the Soviet Union. He does admit some harsh military actions taken by the Soviet Union against breakaway attempts in different parts of the Soviet Union and the eastern bloc but rejects that the Soviet Union ever acted as an imperial power comparable to the British or French empires that clearly drew a line between the colonisers and the subject people.
 
Given the huge amount of literature on the Afghan conflict coming from the west, this translation into Urdu of a book written by a leading authority from Russia is a most valuable addition to that genre of literature.
 
 
(The reviewer is a visiting professor, LUMS, Pakistan, professor emeritus of Political Science, Stockholm University, and honorary senior fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. Latest publications: Winner of the Best Non-Fiction Book award at the Karachi Literature Festival: The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed, Oxford, 2012; and Pakistan: The Garrison State, Origins, Evolution, Consequences (1947-2011), Oxford, 2013. He can be reached at: billumian@gmail.com)
 
The Daily Times, April 28, 2015
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Relations between India and Morocco go back a millennium with the first recorded links dating to the 14th century, when the famous traveller and writer from Tangier, Ibn Batuta, travelled to India.
 
read-more
US President Donald Trump has said he sees a “critical” role for India in his country's South Asia strategy for fighting terrorism and building up a safe Afghanistan.
 
read-more
On 14 August 1947 Pakistan, consisting of East and West Pakistan, celebrated its independence. The 14th was chosen for the ceremony because Lord Mountbatten who came to Karachi as the Chief Guest had to later leave for Delhi where ot the midnight stroke India was to declare its independence.
 
read-more
The Doklam stand-off and a variety recent opinion pieces in magazines and newspapers draws attention to the poor state of defence policy preparedness and the lack of meaningful higher defence control in India. 
 
read-more
The two ideologically divergent ruling partners - the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) - in Jammu and Kashmir are headed for a showdown as the debate over the abrogation of Article 35A of the Constitution of India heats up.
 
read-more
At the root of the present Doklam crisis is China’s intrusion into Bhutanese territory for its road building projects. These connectivity projects are integral to President Xi Jinping’s dream project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). India and Bhutan were the only two countries that did not participate in the first forum
 
read-more
There are six encouraging and bold pillars in the new US strategy on Afghanistan as outlined by President Donald Trump.
 
read-more
Is the United States threatened by Nazism? The short answer is no, notwithstanding the frightening events in Charlottesville, Virginia, recently.
 
read-more
It is a privilege to be invited to this most prestigious of law schools in the country, more so for someone not formally lettered in the discipline of law. I thank the Director and the faculty for this honour.
 
read-more
Column-image

As talk of war and violence -- all that Mahatma Gandhi stood against -- gains prominence across the world, a Gandhian scholar has urged that the teachings of the apostle of non-violence be taken to the classroom.

 
Column-image

Interview with Hudson Institute’s Aparna Pande, whose book From Chanakya to Modi: Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy, was released on June 17.

 
Column-image

This is the continuing amazing spiritual journey of a Muslim man from Kerala who plunged into Vedic religion after a chance encounter with a Hindu mystic under a jackfruit tree in the backyard of his house when he was just nine. It is a story w...

 
Column-image

History is told by the victors but in our modern age, even contemporary events get - or are given - a slant, where some contributors soon get eclipsed from the narrative or their images tarnished.

 
Column-image

Humans have long had a fear of malignant supernatural beings but there may be times when even the latter cannot compare with the sheer evil and destructiveness mortals may be capable of. But then seeking to enable the end of the world due to it...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive