FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
How the war affected the subcontinent
Posted:Oct 1, 2015
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

By Madeeha Maqbool

The Raj at War Author: Yasmin Khan Publisher: Bodley Head; Pgs: 432
 
Reading textbooks of Indian history in school and college, one sees the 1940s as the decade of the struggle for independence, from the Lahore Resolution of 1940 through the elections and the constant fights between Indian politicians and the Raj administration headed by Wavell. On the other hand, in the context of world history, one sees the same decade as the defining period for Allies against Fascism. Read separately, there would seem to be no connection between these two major events shaping 20th century history. It is as if the Second World War barely affected the Indian subcontinent except as the backdrop for eventual independence.
 
British accounts of the Second World War rarely, if ever, acknowledge the “Empire’s” contribution to its victory. There are detailed narratives about the American G Is, the Russians, and all of Europe — it has very much been construed as a western affair. Yasmin Khan sets out to change this state of affairs, highlighting the Indian side of things. The viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, mistakenly thought that the Indians would feel the same way about the war and the necessity of defeating the Fascists as the British did. However, all the decades of segregating the two races and protecting British interests without a thought for the indigenous populace had its consequences. Khan’s description of the ambivalence towards his achievement of the first Indian to be awarded the Victoria Cross highlights this cognitive division between the fighters and those for whom they were fighting.
 
The Indian subjects were more concerned by the food shortages and how to make ends meet. One revealing line states: “The Raj had delivered on few promises for development.” Khan’s account, however, is not one-sided; there are also the “other Indians”, the ones sheltered by wealth from hunger and want. In contrast to the reluctant recruits, Sikandar Hayat Khan, the Chief Minister (CM) of Punjab, sent his sons into the army as a show of loyalty to the British and to encourage Indians to enlist. War served as an equaliser to some extent; at the frontline, some differences between Indian and British receded but change was slow. The war was almost at an end before Indians could sit on Britons’ courts martial and for new recruits the language barrier was a big hurdle to camaraderie. This camaraderie never dissolved identity completely, a reflection of the differences being maintained amongst the civilian population as well. Even as Bengal suffered its worst famine and people died in the streets, one of the Raj’s greatest concerns was to make Britain food secure, at the expense of the Empire.
 
Khan does not recount only the military history of the Second World War. Hers is an account of the ordinary and not-so-ordinary people contributing to the unfolding events. One of the most interesting accounts threading through the book is that of one Aruna Asif Ali, the wife of a Congress leader who politically came of age during the struggle for home rule running parallel to the war. Her husband was imprisoned along with most of the Congress leadership for his political activities but she was not considered a candidate for such treatment because the British did not consider her a threat to their power, a mistake they sorely regretted later. Despite rewards for her arrest, she managed to stay underground with the help of loyal contemporaries and whipped up support for the politics of Nehru as well as the military endeavour of Bose.
 
Official accounts do not include stories of people like Aruna or the victims of the famine, the Jews, the American G Is, their bearers or the nurses and the destitute women and children who had no access to food or livelihood. Putting together their stories in one coherent whole untinted by exaggeration is no mean feat but Yasmin Khan manages to do this in her book. It is a crowd sourcing of various narratives but told with the precision worthy of a historian who won the Royal Historical Society’s Gladstone Prize in 2007. What sets this book apart is not the fact that it attempts to tell a people’s history of the Second World War; rather it is the fact that it tells the stories of the common folk in the context of the “great” historical events. It does this without becoming maudlin or melodramatic and without losing the plot in the meantime.
 
The social reverberations of war also provide a fuller picture of the changes the Indian subcontinent went through. There was a rise in prostitution and venereal disease due to the large numbers of troops stationed here in anticipation of a Japanese attack. No amount of movies made to scare them of the consequences had any effect on the spread of this trade. Alongside this aspect of the war, there is the rise of a class of Indian businessmen who saw opportunities that set them on the path to riches beyond their dreams; some of the illustrious names under this head include the Oberoi hotel empire and the business built by Syed Babar Ali. The war served to create circumstances that ultimately lead to independence, largely because after the colossal cost of waging such a large-scale operation, the British could no longer afford to maintain their empire.
 
Another example of the war’s consequences is that besides sowing the seeds for partition between the Hindus and Muslims, it also contributed to the militarisation of both sides. From the beginning the British had divided the Indians racially according to “military traits”. There were handbooks on the various castes and geographical areas that were most fit for military service and such classifications have continued to this day — a subconscious legacy of the Raj mentality whereby Punjabis were best qualified for service and Pathans were untrustworthy, and only to be recruited reluctantly. This is still reflected in the imbalance amongst our provinces’ representation in the civil-military bureaucracy.
 
Yasmin Khan’s The Raj at War is not a regular historical tome filled with dry and dusty details. It is very much a living breathing history of one of the oft-ignored and reluctantly explored aspects of British history with examples that almost everyone can relate to. Furthermore, it is written in prose that is readable and unassuming, making it a candidate for a lot of popularity amongst the common readers as well as the students of history.
 
 
(The reviewer is a freelance columnist)
 
The Daily Times, October 02, 2015
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image China has handed over two ships to the Pakistan Navy to safeguard the strategic Gwadar port and trade routes under the $ 46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, a move likely to raise alarm in India.  
 
read-more
The possibility of a Taliban attack targeting Emirati officials is not going down well with analysts writes Monish Gulati
 
read-more
Since late 2015, cultural and political issues have strained relations between the two countries with anti-Indian sentiment growing amongst the government and people of Nepal, writes Dr. Binodkumar Singh for South Asia Monitor.  
 
read-more
Recently, vandals desecrated at least 20 Hindu idols and three temples in Jamai bazar area in Tungipara of Gopalganj district of Bangladesh Recently, vandals desecrated at least 20 Hindu idols and three temples in Jamai bazar area in Tungipara of Gopalganj district of Bangladesh
 
read-more
spotlight image

It will also feature glimpses of Indian traditional, folk and tribal art such as Gond, Madhubani and Pattachitra paintings.

 
read-more
spotlight image The prime minister is wrong if she thinks a poorer Britain is the price people want to pay for limiting free movement
 
read-more
spotlight image It is unfortunate that Taiwan has a neighbor across the Taiwan Strait that wants to annex it, but, even more frustrating, Taiwanese also have to put up with people who echo China’s rhetoric and intended to intimidate Taiwanese into obedience.
 
read-more
Read the transcriipt of UN Secretary-General's End-of-Year Press Conference, held in New York on December 16, here...
 
read-more
spotlight image It is wrong to look only at Israel while fighting rages across the Middle East, writes the former Shin Bet chief.
 
read-more
spotlight image In May 2016, defence minister Manohar Parrikar had announced his ambitious plan to hike India's defence exports to two billion dollars by 2018, while adding the government would take into account the concerns while forging strategic partnership in the critical sector.
 
read-more
Column-image

What will be Pakistan's fate? Acts of commission or omission by itself, in/by neighbours, and superpowers far and near have led the nuclear-armed country at a strategic Asian crossroads to emerge as a serious regional and global concern whi...

 
Column-image

Some South African generals, allied with the British forces, sought segregation from the enlisted men, all blacks, after being taken prisoners of war. The surprised German commander told them firmly that they would have to share the same quarte...

 
Column-image

An aching sense of love, loss and yearning permeate this work of fiction which, however, reads like a personal narrative set in an intensely disruptive period of Indian history, and adds to the genre of partition literature, writes Ni...

 
Column-image

This is a path-breaking work on India's foreign policy since Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister in May 2014 and surprised everyone by taking virtual charge of the external affairs portfolio. A man who had been denied visa by some count...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive