FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Imperialists, Nationalists, Democrats: The Collected Essays
Posted:Apr 25, 2013
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Remarks by Indian National Security Advisor Shiv Shankar Menon at the book release of  S. Gopal’s Collected Essays: Imperialists, Nationalists, Democrats (Edited by Srinath Raghavan) on 23 April 2013
 
Shiv Shankar Menon

Srinath Raghavan has done us a great service by bringing together this collection of essays by S. Gopal. This volume is a timely reminder of the work of one of the best among an illustrious generation of Indian historians, who walked the line between academe and policy to the benefit of both. The editor’s introduction is a useful, accurate and objective summary and assessment of Gopal’s life and work.

Like most good books there is something in this book for each of us. Each of us will take from it what we can, what we find relevant, and what we understand of it.

For me reading the book was a constant reminder of the value of contemporary history, of the application of the historian’s craft and mind to contemporary events. GR Elton once said that one should wait two hundred years before attempting a history of events, (page 303). The simplest refutation of this view is in some of these essays by Gopal on twentieth century issues, on the national movement, and on some of the major figures of the early years of our republic. The essays make clear how the application of a historical temper greatly improves our understanding of our contemporaries and the issues of the day.

Nehru was one of those who realised the value of contemporary history and of the historical temper and approach to nation building and to India’s diplomacy. That was why he established the Historical Division in the Ministry of External Affairs and personally selected Gopal, who was then already acquiring an international reputiation as a historian, to head it for twelve years.

(For reasons I find incredible and incomprehensible the Historical Division was wound up by MEA in the nineties. This suggests that someone thought they knew all there was to know about the past! Some of our present difficulties may indeed be due to a lack of memory. I do hope that, as originally intended, one part of the doubling of MEA posts approved by the Cabinet in 2008 will be used to revive the Ministry’s memory and Historical Division.)

As head of MEA’s Historical Division from 1954 to 1966 Gopal led the Division’s work not just on diplomatic history but on the intersection of policy and history, making significant contributions to both. If we have a coherent historical account and an impressive accumulation of evidence on the evolution of the India-China boundary it is thanks to the work of Gopal, GN Rao and others in the Division. Gopal’s understanding of India-China relations, 1962, and Nehru’s China policy as a historical process is evident in his biography of Nehru, and his sense of continuity is strong.

Srinath describes some of this work as “advocacy”, (page 25). But that does not mean that Gopal sacrificed the quality or standard of his work, or that his China work was limited and directed by the requirements of advocacy. Having been fortunate enought to read some of it, I can only hope that the restraints of diplomacy and politics will soon change making this body of Gopal’s work also available to historians and others outside government.

What Gopal’s work in government shows is not so much the constraints of advocacy as the limits of contemporary history: in particular the need to come to quick judgements on the basis of insufficient evidence, and the limitations of contemporary witnesses and documents, many with a self serving interest in the outcome. Churchill said, “History will be kind to me, I intend to write it”. Fifty years later he seems to have been proved correct, even if only in the West. By definition the conclusions from studying contemporary history must be more tentative than those of purist historians who choose to deal only with the more distant past.

The attempt to write contemporary history is worth it not only for Churchill’s stated reason of reputation and fame. The attempt is essential if one is to be self aware or self conscious about what is now called strategic culture, and what Nehru’s generation called a sense of nationhood. An understanding of one’s own history, and of the uses it is put to, is a major factor in building one’s strategic culture.

You are aware of the argument, most vocal in the recent Economist but shared by several Indians, which denies that India has a strategic culture. I have argued elsewhere that this is an impossibility. To say that one has no politics is to make a political choice. It is the same with strategic culture. To say that you do not have one only means that you dislike the one you have.

But more significantly, the slightest application of historical mind shows this proposition to be in a long line of British historiography, of the Cambridge School of John Gallagher and Anil Seal among others, who thought that India was only a geographical expression, and saw India as a collection of irreconcilably antagonistic communities divided by religion and ethnicity. They emphasised local and provincial politics, thus contesting Indian nationalism and its unity. Anyone with a sense of history can see how these arguments justified imperialism. Gopal undertook a logical Liberal refutation of this approach which he saw as “draining Indian nationalism of all ideals and ideology”, (page 30).

The situation is not very different today though the argument that India lacks a strategic culture is couched in contemporary jargon. It takes an application of the historian’s mind to see where ideas like a lack of strategic culture come from, and what their purpose, their effect and their value is. The Economist gives the game away in the last paragraph of the same leader when it concludes that India can be a great power if it allies with the West and does what the West says.

Gopal’s generation of Indian historians were nationalists who consciously strove to be objective in writing history, distancing themselves from and even criticising the national movement adn some of its leading figures. The result was paradoxical. Some of their own generation, who were communal or identity historians, tried to question their patriotism. A subsequent generation accused them of being ‘statist’. Their very defence of secularism in the nineties exposed them to both accusations. Fortunately, both accusations are easily disproved and do not stand logical scrutiny.

The larger issue, as Gopal reminds us throughout these essays, is of our historical memory. Nehru and his Discovery of India are still our larger national macro narrative. Some of Gopal’s essays from the nineties suggest how that narrative was being eroded or chipped at. At the same time the narrative of the sixty-five years after independence is fragmenting. If we are to rescue our national narrative from the 140 character tweet, the thirty second sound-bite, and the conceptual simple-mindedness on complex issues that they induce, we must see a more conscious application of historical method to our current preoccupations.

Let me give you an example of what I mean. We see several memoirs by former civil servants and diplomats. How many display the sensitivity to the history and culture of others and ourselves that the earlier generation of Gundevia, KPSM, Dixit  and others did? Sadly one can count these on the fingers of one hand.

We also see international relations books without soul.  Because they lack the historical approach they fail to explain what we see around us. Braudel spoke of history being viewed from three perspectives of time: the moment when the event occurs; the context of the event which may go back a few decades or a few centuries; and, the long duration -- the build up to context which covers everything including landscape. Our international relations studies lack the second perspective of time and do not even consider the third. Yet how important landscape is to the India-China boundary and relationship as a factor in historical continuity.

That is why history, particularly contemporary history as Gopal practiced it, recognising the role and inter-relationship of individuals and policy in history, is essential for conscious and self-conscious decision making by government, for the political class and for the public at large.

I am grateful to Srinath for reminding us of this truth at a time when it is especially relevant. I dare to think that Gopal himself would have approved of, and been proud of, Srinath’s exemplary introduction. But he would probably have been too modest to say so.

I wish the book and its editor every success.

 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
The first India-China strategic dialogue is to be held on February 22, 2017. This dialogue was proposed during the visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in August last year and it was propagated as a new mechanism for a more comprehensive dialogue between the two countries. 
 
read-more
The Islamic State (IS)  and its ideological affiliates  in Pakistan have claimed responsibility for this attack and threatened that this is only the beginning of such an anti-Sufi /Shia  campaign to exterminate the apostate – or ‘non-believer’ writes C Uday Bhaskar for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
spotlight image India has vital interests in the Middle East and going by the spurt in political engagements since May 2014, the region is a top priority for Prime Minister Narendra Modi writes Md. Muddassir Quamar for South Asia Monitor
 
read-more
The recent violence that took place in Nagaland against the 33 per cent reservation given to women is not only sad, but it would certainly hurt the holistic development of the entire State. The recent violence that took place in Nagaland against the 33 per cent reservation given to women is not only sad, but it would certainly
 
read-more
Society for Policy Studies in association with India Habitat Centre invites you to a lecture in the Changing Asia Series by Dr.Pratap Bhanu Mehta, President and Chief Executive, Centre for Policy Research on Asia: Hope for the Future or Prisoner of the Past?    ...
 
read-more
spotlight image Earlier this week, just after United States President Donald Trump’s top adviser on national security resigned in controversy, a European intelligence official asked a reporter the question on everyone’s mind: “I was hoping you could tell me what’s going on over there [in the US].”
 
read-more
It is high time that Taiwan differentiated its position from Beijing’s claim on South China Sea, writes Namrata Hasija for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
At the moment, Nigerian President Muhammad Buhari is able to stop the violence by pushing the Islamists to the vast Sambisa forests of the Borno State At the moment, Nigerian President Muhammad Buhari is able to stop the violence by pushing the Islamists to the vast Sambisa forests of the Borno State
 
read-more
Every year during the budget, many defence and strategic experts start clamouring for a higher budgetary allocation for the defence sector and this year was no different. The allocation of Rs 2.74 lakh crore (excluding defence pensions) is being perceived as “too less”. Every year during the budget, many defence and
 
read-more
Column-image

India remians the inflexible bête-noir for Pakistan, yet there are few books by Indian authors that have sought to interpret the prodigal neighbour in a holistic, informed and empathetic manner.

 
Column-image

The line that Mortimer Durand drew across a small map in 1893 has bled the Pashtun heart ever since. More than a century later both sides of that line remain restless. But the mystery behind what actually happened on 12 November 1893 has never ...

 
Column-image

What went wrong for the West in Afghanistan? Why couldn't a global coalition led by the world's preeminent military and economic power defeat "a bunch of farmers in plastic sandals on dirt bikes" in a conflict that outlasted b...

 
Column-image

What will be Pakistan's fate? Acts of commission or omission by itself, in/by neighbours, and superpowers far and near have led the nuclear-armed country at a strategic Asian crossroads to emerge as a serious regional and global concern whi...

 
Column-image

Some South African generals, allied with the British forces, sought segregation from the enlisted men, all blacks, after being taken prisoners of war. The surprised German commander told them firmly that they would have to share the same quarte...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive