FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Book Review: The Army and Democracy
Updated:Aug 26, 2014
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Book: The Army and Democracy - Military Politics in Pakistan
Author: Aquil Shah
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Price: 595

Govindan Nair, The Hindu

The central dilemma that Aqil Shah grapples with in this deeply-researched work is Pakistan’s “persistent inability to establish democratic civil-military relations”, resulting in the military swinging pendulum-like between governorship and guardianship of the country. That stands in sharp contrast to neighbouring India with whom it shares a similar historical inheritance. Pakistan was not preordained toward military authoritarianism, any more than India was pre-destined to be a constitutional democracy. But, says Shah, Pakistan’s formative experience and its nation-building problems under conditions of geopolitical insecurity, shaped the military’s tutelary beliefs and norms justifying authoritarian expression of its role in state and society.
 
More than any other factor, Shah asserts, “the conflict with India shaped the initial trajectory of Pakistan’s civil-military relations”. A decade of political skirmishing between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League preceding partition convinced the leadership of newly-created Pakistan that India would never reconcile itself to the existence of the separate nation. Hostilities over Kashmir soon after partition heightened these existential fears and security gained primacy amongst nation-building priorities. With the importance of the army for safeguarding hard-earned nationhood underscored at so early a stage, the military’s ascendance was inexorable.
 
The Pakistan army, like the Indian, was schooled in the British tradition to maintain high professional standards and distance from politics. However, as early as in 1951, a group of Pakistan army officers, supported by some civilians including, notably, the editor of the Pakistan Times, Faiz Ahmed Faiz, hatched the Rawalpindi conspiracy, to seize political control. Led by Major General Akbar Khan, the failed coup reflected the army’s growing distrust of politicians — exacerbated by its perception of the latter’s capitulation to India on the Kashmir issue — and its conviction that survival of the Pakistani state depended on the military. By 1958, the concept of takeover to safeguard the larger national interest had become embedded in the “army’s DNA”.
 
Controlled democracy
 
Jinnah’s decision to assume governor generalship of the country and concomitant viceregal authority, provided the mould for authoritarian centralisation. His illness and early demise, followed by Liaquat Ali Khan’s assassination, left the field open to the generals to play a vital role in institution-building. The absence of popular, let alone visionary and competent, leaders saw the military orchestrating the action from behind the scenes till, in 1958, General Ayub Khan dispensed with all pretence to usher in — in his own words — a new form of “controlled” democracy “suited to the genius” of the Pakistani people. The military would thence rule Pakistan for more than three decades; with its political influence remaining decisive even during the interludes of civilian government.
 
Ayub’s takeover — in which Shah imputes Washington’s complicity — was based on the simple reasoning that politicians and parliamentary democracy could not address Pakistan’s political, economic and social problems, which needed to be resolved using military skills. That mind-set continues almost unchanged to this day. Even defeat in war and the humiliation of losing half its territory did not impact the military’s non-democratic tendencies; indeed the military does not feel the need to own responsibility for its actions.
 
Under General Zia-ul-Haq, “the iron fist of military rule hidden inside the Islamic glove” infiltrated the civilian administration, society and the economy on an unprecedented scale. Zia institutionalised the practice of allotting land to the military for establishing corporate interests. Military welfare associations like the Fauji Foundation expanded from small welfare enterprises to industrial conglomerates having stakes in real estate, fertilisers, oil and gas. Mid-level officers were authorised to invest in business enterprises to raise funds, leading to a vast network of commercial interests. The military establishment jealously protects this lucrative empire, defying steps to enforce accountability and civilian oversight. General Musharraf claimed that the motivation for his coup was the threat to the integrity of the military institution.
 
Increasing role
 
When the military was not exercising governorship of the country, it assigned to itself the role of guardian. Shah avers that the behaviour of the military between 2008 and 2013, when an elected government was in place, reveals a reassertion of its “tutelary mentality” in its efforts “to arbitrate political conflict, exercise oversight of the government, preserve its corporate autonomy, and skirt the rule of law.” He cites instances of General Kayani conveying disapproval over the performance of cabinet ministers, chairing meetings of secretaries of ministries, granting service extensions to service officers without seeking the requisite approval of government, and blocking government initiatives to crack down on terror networks, rein in the ISI, and improve trade relations with India. When Prime Minister Gillani attempted to assert himself, the army retaliated with signals of a coup till the government backed down. Clearly, even with a democratically elected civilian government in place, the military does not see itself as subordinate to the political executive nor subject to civilian control. Pakistan might be heading toward a new civil-military arrangement, Shah conjectures, in which “the military does not seize direct power but formally insinuates its non-democratic privileges into the functioning of democracy.”
 
Having interviewed innumerable officers and studied the Pakistan Army Green Book and papers of the National Defence University, Shah unravels the military psyche: the military believes that parliamentary democracy is particularly inappropriate for Pakistan; that it is entrusted with a “unique mission as the final saviour of the country”; that it must necessarily perform an active role in national development; and, that its national security mission deriving from the Indian threat justifies its special status. Pakistani military doctrine sees India aspiring to be the regional hegemon “committed to destabilising Pakistan through the use of covert means designed to foment and exploit the country’s internal divisions”.
 
Shah’s painstaking research confirms long-held suspicions on this side of the border: that there can be no meaningful peace initiative between the two countries without the blessings of the Pakistan military; that to protect its special status and corporate interests, the military may not be inclined to endorse such initiatives; and, in the event that it did acquiesce in peace with India, it would strive to preserve undiminished its institutional influence.
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 1) Post Comments Post Comment
vivek dhupdale
23-Feb-2015
Excellent Review
Review
 
 
 
 
The first India-China strategic dialogue is to be held on February 22, 2017. This dialogue was proposed during the visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in August last year and it was propagated as a new mechanism for a more comprehensive dialogue between the two countries. 
 
read-more
The Islamic State (IS)  and its ideological affiliates  in Pakistan have claimed responsibility for this attack and threatened that this is only the beginning of such an anti-Sufi /Shia  campaign to exterminate the apostate – or ‘non-believer’ writes C Uday Bhaskar for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
spotlight image India has vital interests in the Middle East and going by the spurt in political engagements since May 2014, the region is a top priority for Prime Minister Narendra Modi writes Md. Muddassir Quamar for South Asia Monitor
 
read-more
The recent violence that took place in Nagaland against the 33 per cent reservation given to women is not only sad, but it would certainly hurt the holistic development of the entire State. The recent violence that took place in Nagaland against the 33 per cent reservation given to women is not only sad, but it would certainly
 
read-more
Society for Policy Studies in association with India Habitat Centre invites you to a lecture in the Changing Asia Series by Dr.Pratap Bhanu Mehta, President and Chief Executive, Centre for Policy Research on Asia: Hope for the Future or Prisoner of the Past?    ...
 
read-more
spotlight image Earlier this week, just after United States President Donald Trump’s top adviser on national security resigned in controversy, a European intelligence official asked a reporter the question on everyone’s mind: “I was hoping you could tell me what’s going on over there [in the US].”
 
read-more
It is high time that Taiwan differentiated its position from Beijing’s claim on South China Sea, writes Namrata Hasija for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
At the moment, Nigerian President Muhammad Buhari is able to stop the violence by pushing the Islamists to the vast Sambisa forests of the Borno State At the moment, Nigerian President Muhammad Buhari is able to stop the violence by pushing the Islamists to the vast Sambisa forests of the Borno State
 
read-more
Every year during the budget, many defence and strategic experts start clamouring for a higher budgetary allocation for the defence sector and this year was no different. The allocation of Rs 2.74 lakh crore (excluding defence pensions) is being perceived as “too less”. Every year during the budget, many defence and
 
read-more
Column-image

India remians the inflexible bête-noir for Pakistan, yet there are few books by Indian authors that have sought to interpret the prodigal neighbour in a holistic, informed and empathetic manner.

 
Column-image

The line that Mortimer Durand drew across a small map in 1893 has bled the Pashtun heart ever since. More than a century later both sides of that line remain restless. But the mystery behind what actually happened on 12 November 1893 has never ...

 
Column-image

What went wrong for the West in Afghanistan? Why couldn't a global coalition led by the world's preeminent military and economic power defeat "a bunch of farmers in plastic sandals on dirt bikes" in a conflict that outlasted b...

 
Column-image

What will be Pakistan's fate? Acts of commission or omission by itself, in/by neighbours, and superpowers far and near have led the nuclear-armed country at a strategic Asian crossroads to emerge as a serious regional and global concern whi...

 
Column-image

Some South African generals, allied with the British forces, sought segregation from the enlisted men, all blacks, after being taken prisoners of war. The surprised German commander told them firmly that they would have to share the same quarte...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive