FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Even with its idiosyncrasies “Yahapalanaya” is infinitely better than its predecessor
Posted:Jan 3, 2016
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Ranga Jayasurya
 
During his first year in office, President Maithripala Sirisena sailed a perfect, politically-correct political voyage. He struck a contrast not only from his predecessor, but also from many other political strongmen (and women) currently ruling the roost in the developing world. To a greater degree, he eschewed aggrandizement of power and trappings of an executive presidency. He publicly announced in his inauguration not to seek a re-election and oversaw the clipping of excessive powers of his own office through the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. None of his predecessors could match his feat.
 
Since power breeds desire for the absolute power, Sri Lankan politics has for long been a victim of power maximizing manoeuvrings of its self- interested politicians.  President Sirisena’s immediate predecessor was the epitome of that crude exercise, but, from first Prime Minister D. S. Senanayake, whose administration disenfranchised Tamils of Indian Origin in order fend off an electoral challenge from left parties, Sri Lanka is awash with such individuals.
 
For whatever reasons, President Sirisena opted not to tread that path.  Therefore, it is a shame that as he concludes his first year in the office, he shot himself on the foot at a meeting in the agrarian town of Ampara, where he resorted to a common place village expression that the organizers of a recent musical concert in Colombo ought to be ‘whipped with a stingray tail’. He mentioned an incident of a woman throwing a bra at the stage and also complained about the high-priced tickets. Inadvertently, he caused the perfect media storm. Cartoonists lampooned him, social media lambasted him. One of his own ministers came to his defence to say that the President did not seek a ban on foreign artistes. The media sensation over President’s remarks is self-explanatory. In the first place, the whole incident is what would make a ‘sexy’ news: a female fan tossing her undergarment and the Head of the State thinking that it was worth commenting on. But, there is a second reason; perhaps, there had been no other strong enough context to pick on the President. He has not sacked a Chief Justice because she gave rulings against his wish, or endorsed white vans as an official policy, intimidated media, civil society and family members of disappeared Tamil youth with military intelligence operatives or appointed his entire extended family and their cronies to the foreign service.
 
"Since power breeds desire for the absolute power, Sri Lankan politics has for long been a victim of power maximizing manoeuvrings of its self- interested politicians.  President Sirisena’s immediate predecessor was the epitome of that crude exercise"
 
Also, when the President became the object of lampooning, editors did not receive threatening phone calls from the President’s Office nor were media owners were told to tone down the coverage or risk repercussions. Cartoonists were not given white van rides. The BBS did not come forward (with the tacit approval from the powers that be) to wage a cultural crusade against western cultural influence and to incite nationalist support for the President’s remarks. The woman that threw her undergarments did not receive death threats. BBC that first reported the remarks on ‘whipping with a stingray tail’, which was later republished worldwide (perhaps because the expression was so colloquial that local media did not find anything interesting in it at first sight) was not given marching orders.  But, all of that could have happened a year ago. That is the major contrast between the incumbent President and his predecessor. In a way, what transpired since his remarks on the bra tossing is microscopic of the political transformation that Sri Lanka had been through since January 8, last year.
 
That change is remarkable and was unimaginable one year ago.  Not many countries in the world increasingly beset by violence and undemocratic governments can claim for that record.
 
Momentary idiosyncrasies of the new government (And this time of the President) cannot dampen the profound positive impact of that transformation. Again, there is a clear difference: Such idiosyncrasies, be they amending the budget proposals for the umpteenth time or addressing local villagers with an expression they are familiar with are way less dangerous than the well calibrated sinister manoeuvrings of the former regime. They are less frightening than broad-day light abductions, extra-judiciary killings and turning a respected judiciary into a kangaroo court.
 
For the first year of the presidency of Mr. Sirisena, that judiciary has regained its independence. The arbitrariness of the political powers has been reined. Old habits die hard, so the politicians and their cronies could well indulge in thuggery, nepotism and other less salubrious deeds, but the police are free to hound them, unlike in the past. Independent Commissions have been reinvigorated, if they fail in indicting the corrupt doers of the former regime, they would at least have a restraining effect on the holders of the current administration. For the first time in recent memory, a bipartisan reconciliation effort is currently underway. Tamils feel freer today and share a sense of being stakeholders of the State. Self-serving nationalism is kept at bay, primarily because the new government refused to patronize those elements. (The President himself asked his predecessor not to incite ethnic passions to win votes).
 
In the highly polarized Sri Lankan politics, no good things can happen easily. If the President is held back by the rent-seeking elements of his own party, who are being led by his own predecessor, the TNA leadership which struck a conciliatory note has been hamstrung by fringe elements within the Tamil community led by one time respected jurist and the Northern Chief Minister C.Vigneshwaran. Again, that there is a collective effort by both sides to navigate away from petty ‘ethnic bidding’ that characterized Sri Lankan politics in the past is a pleasant contrast.  The former regime is distinguished by the absence of any genuine commitment.
 
"Tamils feel freer today and share a sense of being stakeholders of the State. Self-serving nationalism is kept at bay, primarily because the new government refused to patronize those elements"
 
If domestic politics is becoming more democratic and pluralistic, Sri Lanka has garnered international recognition for those positive changes.  Foreign policy muddle has been sorted out. Diplomatic isolation in the free world has ended. Democracies from India to Japan and the USA are willing to be seen with us. Such a rapport, if correctly managed, would bring far reaching economic benefits in the future.
 
Again, none of that could have been possible if the election went the other way on January 8 last year. If that were the case, we would still be living under the shadow of white vans, officially sanctioned extra judiciary killings, suffocated media and a kangaroo court to hear our grievances. It is in this context, that the difference between the incumbent government and its predecessor looms large. Even with its mild idiosyncrasies, “Yahapalanaya” is indefinitely better than its predecessor. One would hope it would retain that qualitative edge.   - See more at: http://www.dailymirror.lk/101619/even-with-its-idiosyncrasies-yahapalanaya-is-infinitely-better-than-its-predecessor#sthash.PoHox9dr.dpuf
 
Daily Mirror, Januaru 4, 2016
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
India's successful launch of putting a record 104 satellites into orbit is a wake-up call for China's commercial space industry which has a lot to learn from New Delhi's frugal space programme, a Chinese government mouthpiece that publishes in English said in one of its rare editorials in which it commended an Indian action
 
read-more
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit Israel later this year – a first by an Indian head of the government that comes 25 years after the two countries established full diplomatic ties. The visit, a long awaited one.
 
read-more
spotlight image For a Dongria child, the schooling process not only displaces him of the community and the land but also displaces him from his own way of seeking truth i.e through nature, writes Rajaraman Sundaresan for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
Society for Policy Studies in association with India Habitat Centre invites you to a lecture in the Changing Asia Series by Dr.Pratap Bhanu Mehta, President and Chief Executive, Centre for Policy Research on Asia: Hope for the Future or Prisoner of the Past?    ...
 
read-more
US President Donald Trump’s first few days in office have witnessed a profusion of apocalyptic predictions for the world economy.  His unabashed move to encourage protectionism in the world economy does not augur well for the future of the trading regime
 
read-more
It is high time that Taiwan differentiated its position from Beijing’s claim on South China Sea, writes Namrata Hasija for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
At the moment, Nigerian President Muhammad Buhari is able to stop the violence by pushing the Islamists to the vast Sambisa forests of the Borno State At the moment, Nigerian President Muhammad Buhari is able to stop the violence by pushing the Islamists to the vast Sambisa forests of the Borno State
 
read-more
Sometime in later half of last year when Indo-Pak tensions peaked, military operation heads in J&K received unusual calls on their landlines. Sometime in later half of last year when Indo-Pak tensions peaked, military operation heads in J&K received unusual calls on their landlines.
 
read-more
Column-image

India remians the inflexible bête-noir for Pakistan, yet there are few books by Indian authors that have sought to interpret the prodigal neighbour in a holistic, informed and empathetic manner.

 
Column-image

The line that Mortimer Durand drew across a small map in 1893 has bled the Pashtun heart ever since. More than a century later both sides of that line remain restless. But the mystery behind what actually happened on 12 November 1893 has never ...

 
Column-image

What went wrong for the West in Afghanistan? Why couldn't a global coalition led by the world's preeminent military and economic power defeat "a bunch of farmers in plastic sandals on dirt bikes" in a conflict that outlasted b...

 
Column-image

What will be Pakistan's fate? Acts of commission or omission by itself, in/by neighbours, and superpowers far and near have led the nuclear-armed country at a strategic Asian crossroads to emerge as a serious regional and global concern whi...

 
Column-image

Some South African generals, allied with the British forces, sought segregation from the enlisted men, all blacks, after being taken prisoners of war. The surprised German commander told them firmly that they would have to share the same quarte...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive