FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Perplexing papal priority
Posted:Dec 4, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By C R Abrar
 
The dusts of Suhrawardy Udyan have settled down by now. The much-talked-about papal visit to Burma and Bangladesh has come to an end. The visit created quite a bit of furore both at home and abroad. The Vatican staunchly defended its decision of not allowing the Pope to utter the word “Rohingya” during his Burma visit. Its spokesperson claimed that “the Pope is not going to lose any moral authority” and insisted that “still stands (intact).” Detractors, however, felt the Pope fell short of what was expected of him, given his strong track record of advocating for refugees and migrants. They held that “there should be nothing controversial about the Pope identifying people by the name they want” (Fortify Rights) and felt betrayed that he missed out “an unparalleled opportunity” to bring light to the indiscriminate violence against the Rohingya.
 
Terming or not terming a group by its preferred self-identification tag is not an issue of simple semantics. Intrinsically tied to this is the question of recognition of a group's right to self-identification. An important component of Burma's ruling elite's genocidal agenda against the Rohingya is the denial of the latter's self-identity. Since the military takeover in 1962, the State in Burma launched a systematic campaign to destroy the Rohingya identity. Despite the existence of valid historical records and official documentation of the existence of the Rohingya community in Arakan for centuries, the Burmese authorities deviously present them as “illegal migrants” from the region that is currently Bangladesh. Rejecting the Burmese claim that Rohingya are recent arrivals and the Rakhines are original settlers, eminent SOAS historian Michael Charney persuasively establishes “the shared immigrant nature of the entire population of the littoral” known as Arakan. He strongly argues that “No group in Arakan would pass the test as 'indigenous.'”
 
The Pope's acquiescence to the pressure of the Burmese authorities for denying the use of the term Rohingya was a missed opportunity to condemn the genocidal acts of the Burmese government. His act became a party to the denial of the group identity of a people who are facing an existential threat from a state-sponsored genocidal act. Had the Pope stood his ground, it would have probably encouraged many others to support the rights of the Rohingya. It was a missed opportunity for the Pope “to publicly refute the unconscionable pressure by Aung San Suu Kyi and the Myanmar military to deny the Rohingya their identity.” (Human Rights Watch)
 
At a recent RMMRU conference on Ending the Slow Burning Genocide of Rohingya by Myanmar, Rohingya activist Nay San Win reminded, “The term Rohingya is not a racial slur. It is a dignified term for more than two million people who are living across the world.” The then UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, in 2014 in Naypyidaw, expressed concerns about the welfare of the country's Rohingya Muslims. Ban did so in deference to the international human rights principle of self-identification of groups, and to the obvious dismay of his hosts.
 
It will be unfair to hold Pope as an individual responsible for this blunder. At a press conference in Yangon held at the end of Pope's visit to the country, Myanmar's Catholic Church's Bishop John Hsane Hgyi suggested that reports of atrocities being committed are not “reliable” or “authoritative” and that those who are criticising Myanmar's response to a complex situation should “go into the field to study the reality and history” to obtain “true news.” Such statements do not help but remind the observers to recall the complicity of the Vatican and other German Churches with the Nazi regime, and to wonder that the corpus of international human rights instruments that have been framed over the last 70 years have had little impact on the institution. The Rohingya episode has again demonstrated that despite their avowed declaration to stand up for the wretched of the earth, when push comes to shove, the institution does not condemn the perpetrators at appropriate moments when it should and such condemnation would wake up the rest of the world to the realities of what is going on.
 
The papal trip to Burma was conceived in June this year, much before the current wave of atrocities began. As the situation in Arakan deteriorated since August 26, the Vatican secured ample warning about the wanton genocidal acts of the Burmese security forces with active connivance of the Buddhist vigilante groups. One wonders what prompted the minders of the Pope to execute the visit even when the refugees were fleeing violence in Arakan. This visit, as one observer put it, was essentially “wading into a diplomatic and political minefield.” One may recall that Pope Francis in the recent past has publicly denounced “the persecution of Rohingya brothers and sisters” who he said were “tortured and killed, simply because they uphold their Muslim faith.” In the decades ahead, if and when the Vatican releases the documents pertaining to this papal visit, one would get to know whether the Burma visit was the result of internecine conflict within the Vatican establishment to malign an otherwise progressive Pope or was it a collective decision to promote Catholicism in a country where Christianity is the fastest growing faith, according to 2014 Population and Housing Census conducted by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA).
 
During the first two days of his visit to Bangladesh marked by formal meetings, the Pope did not utter the term Rohingya. It is only during his meeting with the members of the affected community that he made a reference to Rohingya. The Pope had little to offer to his baffled Rohingya guests. He was visibly moved by the horrific recounting of experiences of the Rohingya families. But it appears even those were not enough for the leader of the planet's 1.6 billion Catholics to unequivocally condemn the genocidal acts of the barbarous Burmese regime. Instead, he begged forgiveness for the rest of the world for turning a blind eye, for dragging its feet and not acting, for not extending its support, for not being tough on Burma and for appearing to give parity to the Rohingya militants' attack on police posts in August with the three-month-long brutal campaign of the Burmese military that had resulted in the exodus of hundreds of thousands of refugees. Without extending his support to the demands of the victims for trial of the perpetrators, one wonders what prompted the pontiff to ask for forgiveness on behalf of the architects and executioners of this slow burning genocide when they themselves are celebrating their murderous acts? Surely there is no reason to believe that Gen. Ming Aung Hlaing, the head of the Burmese army and the Butcher of Arakan, broached the idea to the Holy Father when they met in Yangon!
 
The Rohingya episode drives home the point that despite his efforts in promoting the cause of the underprivileged, his own herd, the Catholics, remain the Pope's priority. In this context, a question raised by the Chicago-based Rohingya Nasir Zakaria – “Is one minority more valuable than another?” – becomes pertinent. The Vatican should learn from the fact that the appeasement policy of Hitler during the World War II did not work. If the genocidal regime in Burma is not effectively resisted, one would not be surprised that in its project to make Burma only for Buddhists the regime will target the Christians and other minorities soon after it accomplishes the current task of annihilating Rohingya. The episode further lays bare the irony that the debate surrounding the Rohingya has reduced to utterances while the entire population in Arakan is facing genocidal extermination. Shame on the international community for failing to acknowledge and decisively act on this slow burning genocide.
 
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Indonesia’s President Joko Widodo has confirmed his presence for the occasion. In an exclusive interview with INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS, Indonesia’s Ambassador to India, Sidharto R.Suryodipuro, reminded Nilova Roy Chaudhury that the first Chief Guest for India’s Republic Day celebrations, in 1950, w
 
read-more
The words of Ho Chi Minh  “Nothing is more precious than independence and liberty” rang true for the people of the erstwhile East Pakistan when, with increasing brutality, the West Pakistani oppression spread across the land, writes Anwar A Khan from Dhaka
 
read-more
In a significant boost to New Delhi's Act East Policy, India and Japan set up the Act East Forum on Tuesday as agreed during Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's visit to India this year for the annual bilateral meeting that would help to focus and catalyse development in India's Northeast.
 
read-more
During an awards ceremony honouring six serving and former diplomats and international civil servants for their contributions to world peace and development, the UN was hailed as an institution embodying the Diwali spirit of good overcoming evil. Among those who received the award was Assistant Secretary-General Lakshmi Puri, who is al
 
read-more
When a rising power challenges an incumbent one, war often follows. That prospect, known as the Thucydides trap after the Greek historian who first described it, looms over relations between China and the West, particularly America. So, increasingly, does a more insidious confrontation. Even if China does not seek to conquer foreign la
 
read-more
The first thing that one sees when a flight approaches New Delhi is thick smog that envelopes the city and its lack of greenery.  In almost all other major cities of India lack of greenery is the most obvious sight that one sees when approaching it by air.
 
read-more

Pakistan has agreed to allow the rupee to depreciate after holding talks with the International Mone­tary Fund (IMF) on the country's economy.

 
read-more

Two major global changes in the past year; the ‘Brexit’ referendum and the advent of Donald Trump, writes Sandeep Kaur Bhatia

 
read-more

It is also imperative for India to explore other regions for markets. Its trade deficit with Latin America has been narrowing. Also, its trade with Mexico, Colombia and Guatemala has increased, ...

 
read-more
Column-image

Title: A Ticket to Syria; Author: Shirish Thorat; Publisher: Bloomsbury India: Pages: 254; Price: Rs 399

 
Column-image

Gorichen, a majestic peak in the Eastern Himalayas at an altitude of 22,500 feet, is the highest in Arunachal Pradesh. Beautiful to look at and providing a fantastic view from the top, it is extremely tough climb for mountaineers.

 
Column-image

It is often conjectured if the reason for long-standing conflicts and insurgencies, in the developing world, especially South Asia, is not only other powers fishing in troubled waters but also the keenness of arms industries, mostly Western, to...

 
Column-image

Title: The People Next Door -The Curious History of India-Pakistan Relations; Author: T.C.A. Raghavan; Publisher: HarperCollins ; Pages: 361; Price: Rs 699

 
Column-image

Could the North Korean nuclear issue which is giving the world an anxious time due to presence of hotheads on each side, the invasion of Iraq and its toxic fallout, and above all, the arms race in the teeming but impoverished South Asian subcon...