FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
‘Future of Politics’ in Bangladesh
Posted:Aug 13, 2012
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Mamun Rashid

A journalist friend quoting an economist having a track record of ‘enjoying fishing in the troubled waters’ told me the other day – “The present government wants to cling to power till 2021 by hook or crook, but this is not going to happen.” “The next transition to democracy is going to be much more painful,” he added.

I thought wanting to stay in power for a longer time cannot be a crime, provided there is election at regular interval, people go to the polling centres and there is a free and fair election with the participation of all approved political parties. I have exactly quoted an US ambassador who was heard saying in 2006 — “If people come to the polling centres, if the election is held, I don’t care who wins even if it is Jamaat-e-Islami; the government of the United States of America will extend all-out support to that government.”

The acting secretary general of Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has recently mentioned something which had to a great extent echoed general sentiment of the people prevailing in the country. He said his party would not support any attempt by any undemocratic force or forces to seize power unconstitutionally, and that the party will put up resistance to foil such adventurism. He reiterated that BNP does not believe in or support any undemocratic force having the ambition of coming to power illegally. In the same breath he said that rather they would welcome any new political party joining the contingent with people’s support behind it.

The common people would mostly agree with what the BNP secretary general said about resisting undemocratic forces, seizing power through the back door and welcoming new political parties coming up with people’s support. Such statements foreshadow practice of healthy, democratic politics in an environment where multi-party politics can exist and flourish so that a nation can march on amongst the comity of nations. There is no reason why everyone should not welcome this. But it remains to be said that the much-hyped environment has to be created by the major political parties of the country that are legally and morally bound to preach and practise democracy and uphold all democratic institutions. Thus the onus of keeping democracy alive rests on their collective shoulders.

The ground reality, however, paints a dismal picture of the political landscape of the country. The two major political parties — the Awami League and the BNP — are veritably at loggerheads that has pushed society to the classic ‘Catch-22’ situation. Political analysts deduce that the stalemate, unless unlocked within a short time, would contribute to creating the ground for undemocratic forces to enter the stage at any opportune moment. It is being widely felt that the impasse would ultimately construct an entrapment for both the major political parties from which it would be difficult to retreat before paying a heavy toll.

The two major political parties do not have many options left to overcome the situation created by their own brands of politics. Therefore, they will have to work hard and more importantly work together to remove the obstacles on way to democracy. If they continue to refuse to budge an inch from their position today, they may have to face an adversary tomorrow much more horrendous than ever imagined. At least this is what is being discussed in the ‘corridors’ nowadays.

‘Hand on heart’, most of us could not visualise the model of ‘army-backed interim government’ (popularly known as 1/11 government) in the later part of 2006, though most of us were dismayed with what was happening around. ‘Doctrine of necessity’ might open doors for newer products or even innovative solutions, which may not look like the previously known or practised ones, but may be accepted by newer or emerging ‘target market’.

The other day, a friend asked me one extremely blunt question -- is our politics and politicians becoming outdated? Are they becoming increasingly irrelevant to the possible future of the country? Are they losing out of ‘enough weapons’ to tackle the emerging need of the business community or budding entrepreneurs, who are like it or not being put up at the ‘centre of the plate’? I would humbly consent that our politicians are trying out their best to resist any change in the political culture. Again and again they are being seen to use the only archaic weapon they do have and coming out to be totally flop. It seems that they are extremely resistive to change and intolerant to new ideas. They know their days are numbered; this cannot go on forever, yet they are ruthless and stuck with their past glories without any visibility about the future. Now our politicians need to be convinced why they have to read the signs on the wall and act fast to drive change. Otherwise, they may not like it though; they all will be lost in the sea of oblivion. May the Almighty bless our politicians!

The writer teaches at BRAC Business School.

The Daily Sun, 14 August 2012

 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
The signing of the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) by Defence Minister Parrikar in Washington DC with his US counterpart Dr. Ash Carter is a positive development - albeit long delayed,

 
read-more
Nepal and India share an open border and thus the ramifications of the political tumult being witnessed in the former are bound to spill over into the other side of the border. To assume, as the former PM of Nepal would have us believe, that India has nothing to lose will be misplaced, writ...

 
read-more
Europe is on edge. The most piquant symbol is the move by French beach resorts to ban the burkini, a full body covering swimsuit with a cap for Muslim women in contrast to the revealing bikini. But the disquiet is deep i...

 
read-more
Rodrigo Duterte, the new President of the Philippines, gives good copy. Here's a quote from his final election rally: “Forget the laws on human rights. If I make it to the presidential pala...

 
read-more
Every catastrophe in Turkey in recent months has been greeted with the superlative, “deadliest”. Only the intensity varies with every bout of mortal fundamentalism.

 
read-more
Unlike the country’s air and land forces, the Indian Navy did not have any significant French connection till 2002, when protracted negotiations between New Delhi and Paris ultimately led to th...

 
read-more
Column-image

Sri Lanka has to be the most beautiful country I have ever seen, says John Gimlette, an accomplished travel writer who journeys to the island nation at the end of a long and brutal civil war. Anyone who has se...

 
Column-image

"Perilous Interventions: The Security Council and the politics of chaos" is an insider's account and interpretation of the West's  "desire for geopolitical domination" which ha...

 
Column-image

Ambassador Abdali argues that Pakistan’s nurture of intolerant and violent religious fundamentalists not only effectuates the destruction of Afghanistan but inevitably blows back at Pakistan itself, equally harming, killing and swallowing...

 
Column-image

The book is an in depth study to resurrect maritime diplomacy and redefine its activity using naval apparatus for present era. The book chugs into deep to explain the vital reasons why maritime diplomacy would...

 
Column-image

Rohit Prasad set out to probe how the government and ordinary people in India's remote areas used IT and communication technology to transform society. But when he saw how the other half lived in abysmal c...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter