FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Pakistan flows the wrong way
Updated:May 21, 2012
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

By Harold A. Gould

There is a venerable old saying, in Hindi, which declares: Ulti Ganga behti hai.   It means literally that the Ganges River (Ganga) is flowing backward. It refers obviously to things going  in the wrong direction, or upside down.

The fact that Pakistan conforms to this state of affairs, or that ‘Pakistan ulti behti hai’  is strikingly evident in the recent decision by the military dominated  political establishment  in Islamabad to blame  the USA for all of the political ills from which the country suffers, and for the corresponding deteriorating relations between the two countries. Indeed, the moral responsibility for what has taken place, especially recently, like the waters of the Ganga, has definitely been flowing upside down, even after making allowances for the fact that historically speaking  the U.S. is far from having been an angel.            

Put another way, it is a case of the political basket-case condemning the  basket’s donor for what has gone rotten inside it. By essentially de facto severing relations with the U.S., and for all practical purposes interdicting the supply lines  winding through their country destined for  US  troops fighting in Afghanistan ,  thus compelling the U.S. to route the bulk of the supplies for its forces via the northern distribution network  (NDN) through Latvia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Russia at double the  cost ,  Pakistan’s  leaders, both civilian and military alike, have been cynically biting the hand that has so munificently fed them for over half a century.

Such wolf-crying would be comic were it not for the horrendous strategic and human consequences which such childish political antics are having not only for Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the U.S. but for the region writ large.

What obviously makes the collapse of US-Pakistani relations in this manner especially unsavory is the fact that it comes after the colossal investment of treasure (literally billions upon billions of dollars) which the U.S. has poured into Pakistan over  more than a half-century in what proves to have been a naive expectation that integrity counts ;  that Pakistan would reciprocally become a  stalwart  US ally in the region ,  acting not only during the Cold War as a critical cog in  John  Foster Dulles’s cordon sanitaire around the Soviet Union ;  act  also as a strategic counterfoil to allegedly politically uncooperative India;  and then in the aftermath of the Soviet Afghanistan misadventure, as a so-called  ‘non-NATO Ally’   in the post-911 war against Al Qaeda, and the Taliban.

This pattern of  Pakistani whining about being betrayed by its  perennial benefactor and enabler is    not new. It differs mainly in degree from the past, perhaps acting as prelude to today’s bizarre developments. It happened after all when the U.S. refused to support and legitimize Pakistan’s cavalier attack on India in 1965 during Gen. Ayub Khan’s tenure, and again in 1971when all the U.S. was willing to do was rattle a saber or two (e.g.,the Enterprise task force up the Bay of Bengal), and blandly call for a cease fire after Gen. Yahya Khan fomented war with India in the course of launching his genocidal attack on East Pakistan  ,  soon to become Bangladesh. In both cases Pakistan cried ‘betrayal’  because they had deluded themselves into believing that U.S. military aid was tantamount to an alliance against India,  when in fact it was never intended to be  more than a strategic ploy in the Cold War.

So the present upside-down Pakistani blame-game is really an old story. Primarily a matter of cynical and opportunistic chickens having come home to roost!

The main cause for this denouement in U.S.-Pakistan relations is actually because Pakistan has from the beginning of its recruitment into the US  strategic orbit been coddled like the proverbial omnipotent  and special child -   allowed to get away with rhetorical murder without being meaningfully called to account.

Interestingly, it was the recently unfrocked Pakistani ambassador to the U.S., Husain Haqqani, who in an earlier incarnation (as a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment) had characterized his country as a ‘rental state’  cynically selling its  military soul to whomever was willing to pay the freight. The fact that this has been perpetually the case in fact has a lot to do with the recent Memo-Gate flap,  with Husain Haqqani (I think down deep everyone knows) surreptitiously attempting to induce the U.S. through  Admiral Mullen to try and curb the capacity of the Pakistani military elite and their civilian adjuncts to continue subverting the country’s civil society while ‘renting’  the country to the jihadi extremists. Mr. Haqqani, after all, was close to Benazir Bhutto and the PPP when she was attempting to shorn Pakistan of Zia-fundamentalism and towards a genuinely civil society on the Indian and Western democratic models, and thus compatibly conjoined with American efforts to purge the Cold War residuum from the South Asian political environment.

In the present political atmosphere, however, chances are that whatever hope resided in this furtive and firmly unacknowledged Haqqani-Mullen undertaking is dead on arrival. There is every indication that the impending meeting between U.S. and Pakistani officials to try and reopen the supply lines and achieve a political understanding on matters of sovereignty and military cooperation will yield another version of the reverse-flowing Ganga. Because from the Pakistani standpoint as well as from the murmurings coming out of Washington, all signs point to the U.S. once more adopting an appeasement posture and acting as the contrite mentor,  who avoids putting teeth in any serious demands for the fundamental changes needed in Pakistani political behavior  - one that would put the Generals and the ISI under civilian control where they belong (one of the things that Memo-Gate sought); would play a positive role in purging the remnants of Al Qaeda; would bring the Taliban to the negotiating table, and achieve a constructive peace settlement in Afghanistan.

Indeed, the  Pakistan  river  will continue its ‘ulti’  course and the people of  the blighted state  will keep  paying the price.

[Harold Gould is Visiting Scholar in the Center for South Asian Studies at the University of Virginia]

 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
At the global level, 2017 is the year of  complex uncertainty.  The arrival of President Donald Trump in the White House is expected to herald unexpected exigencies that could have a bearing on India’s own security dynamic, writes C. Uday Bhaskar for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
The possibility of a Taliban attack targeting Emirati officials is not going down well with analysts writes Monish Gulati
 
read-more
Since late 2015, cultural and political issues have strained relations between the two countries with anti-Indian sentiment growing amongst the government and people of Nepal, writes Dr. Binodkumar Singh for South Asia Monitor.  
 
read-more
The Indo-US strategic partnership has been a source of constant tension in Pak-US ties in recent years. The US has pursued ‘de-hyphenation’ ie dealing with Islamabad and New Delhi relatively independently of each other. The Indo-US strategic partnership has been a source of constant tension in Pak-US ties in recent
 
read-more
Marking the 100th year of its journey in promoting academic research on matters related to Asia and Africa, the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London hosted its 'Centenary and Campaign Celebrations' in New Delhi on January 17, 2017 with the Society for Policy...
 
read-more
The year 2017 is set to be another seismic one for European politics with a number of national and regional elections set to test the region’s appetite for far right, nationalist politics in the wake of Brexit and the election of Donald Trump. The year 2017 is set to be another seismic one for European politics with a num
 
read-more
spotlight image Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe just wrapped up his tour to four Asia-Pacific nations - the Philippines, Australia, Indonesia and Vietnam - Thursday. During the six-day trip, he mentioned the South China Sea disputes on many occasions to keep China in check in the name of maritime security.
 
read-more
Read the transcript of PM Modi's Inaugural Address at Second Raisina Dialogue, New Delhi (January 17, 2017)  
 
read-more
By inviting Sheikh Mohammad bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the United Arab Emirates Armed forces, as the chief guest on this year’s Republic Day celebrations, the Modi Government has signaled importance India attaches to its ties with the Emirates.  
 
read-more
In 2012, former Indian defence minister, Jaswant Singh, had reportedly told American journalist Tom Hundley, “There is no Cold Start doctrine… It was an off-the-cuff remark from a former chief of staff. I have been defence minister of the country; I should know.” India’s new army chief, by boldly shattering the
 
read-more
Column-image

What went wrong for the West in Afghanistan? Why couldn't a global coalition led by the world's preeminent military and economic power defeat "a bunch of farmers in plastic sandals on dirt bikes" in a conflict that outlasted b...

 
Column-image

What will be Pakistan's fate? Acts of commission or omission by itself, in/by neighbours, and superpowers far and near have led the nuclear-armed country at a strategic Asian crossroads to emerge as a serious regional and global concern whi...

 
Column-image

Some South African generals, allied with the British forces, sought segregation from the enlisted men, all blacks, after being taken prisoners of war. The surprised German commander told them firmly that they would have to share the same quarte...

 
Column-image

An aching sense of love, loss and yearning permeate this work of fiction which, however, reads like a personal narrative set in an intensely disruptive period of Indian history, and adds to the genre of partition literature, writes Ni...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive