FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
‘India’s territorial concerns valid but it can be more flexible on Belt Road Initiative while having red lines’
Posted:May 16, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
BRI is said to involve over 60 countries, 4.4 billion people and 29% of global GDP, with over $1 trillion of Chinese government money. How much of this is hype and how much is real?
 
Whatever numbers we are getting to hear are what is being told to us by the Chinese but the biggest problem with this initiative so far is that it is not very clear where specifically this money will go, in terms of projects. The only element where some details have been provided is CPEC. No other segment has any clarity: on project or whether there will be Chinese companies coming in or whether they will be collaborating on terms of engagement and so on. What the Chinese are trying to do is to take existing projects like Gwadar port in Pakistan or Hambantota in Sri Lanka and saying that these are all part of OBOR. There is a certain degree of lack of transparency and more information and clarity are needed.
 
Otherwise, you might end up with situations where countries that need money for new initiatives, bring in Chinese companies on their terms and then end up discovering that they are in a perpetual debt trap. This has actually happened with Sri Lanka. There are expectations this might happen with Pakistan as well.
 
The majority of countries in the OBOR geography, especially in Central Asia, are all looking for funds and it is quite easy for the Chinese to sell them this carrot of funding for infrastructure and public goods for making OBOR politically legitimate. The only country which can counter this is India. Russia is playing a strategic game as they want to align with China for a variety of reasons.
 
Is India getting support for its stand on the problems with CPEC?
 
India is the only country which has a sovereignty issue with this because of CPEC passing through PoK. India’s grievance is legitimate but CPEC came before they started calling this the Belt Road Initiative. China was aware that India would object but didn’t bother. However, the land part is not the only component of this initiative. There is also a big maritime infrastructure part, which India needs to look at more objectively. India can simply say that we won’t agree to the corridor passing through our territories but on the other aspects of the project we are prepared to discuss. That way you don’t send out a signal to the rest of the community that you are spoiling the show. Unfortunately, no country till now has come out openly in support of India’s concerns.
 
So India can be more flexible while having its red lines?
 
Exactly. That is what we must do. There is no point in driving ourselves into a corner since we won’t get supporters. A third country will go with whatever benefits it. We can negotiate because this project can never be fully successful without India. Purely from geographic and economic perspectives, it can only work if India is there. Our presence in OBOR will also give a sense of comfort to many other countries.
 
How is this being seen in Southeast Asia?
 
BRI is a reasonably big deal in the region and being looked at as an initiative which can recharge economic momentum. No country wants to annoy China. The Nepalese ambassador’s statement sums up the reality where he said we don’t want to cause grief to India but China is an economic giant. You can’t afford not to play ball with them. The ability they have for creating economic damage is substantive.
 
So as the US retreats, China steps in?
 
One of the difficulties we have is that China has started projecting this as part of its effort to push trade and globalisation. That sentiment resonates a lot in Asia. We cannot claim that we are a pro-connectivity country while continuing to create obstacles in trade talks. In the BRI vision document, trade is big with mention of multiple economic zones. It could all be speculative but it is there. We can get isolated on this.
 
Times of India, May 17, 2017
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Ties between India and Japan are probably at their best ever, Japanese Ambassador to India H.E. Kenji Hiramatsu told India Review & Analysis’ Nilova Roy Chaudhury, as he outlined how the two countries have moved closer. Ahead of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s visit
 
read-more
The eight members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) should strengthen cooperation against terrorism and build it into its framework, India's External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj said in New York on September 20.
 
read-more
That regional cooperation in South Asia is lower than optimal levels is well accepted. It is usually ascribed to – the asymmetry in size between India and the rest, conflicts and historical political tensions, a trust deficit, limited transport connectivity, and onerous logistics, among many other factors.
 
read-more
Reflections on September evoke a host of memories.
 
read-more
  During the budget session of the legislative assembly, the Chief Minister informed the  House about state’s missing children. According to her, as many as 162 children have gone missing in the past three years.
 
read-more
The Communist Party of China (CPC) is expected to amend its constitution at the upcoming national congress.
 
read-more
Finally breaking her silence on the Rohingya exodus, Myanmar’s state counsellor and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi has said that her government would like to understand the root causes of the refugee crisis and investigate charges of human rights abuses.
 
read-more
The apprehension was justified. US President Donald Trump’s disregard for institutions and fondness for reckless rhetoric meant that his maiden appearance at the annual UN General Assembly was a closely watched affair.
 
read-more
It is a privilege to be invited to this most prestigious of law schools in the country, more so for someone not formally lettered in the discipline of law. I thank the Director and the faculty for this honour.
 
read-more
Column-image

Title: A Bonsai Tree; Author: Narendra Luther; Publisher: Niyogi Books; Pages: 227 Many books have been written on India's partition but here is a firsthand account of the horror by a migrant from what is now Pakistan, who ...

 
Column-image

As talk of war and violence -- all that Mahatma Gandhi stood against -- gains prominence across the world, a Gandhian scholar has urged that the teachings of the apostle of non-violence be taken to the classroom.

 
Column-image

Interview with Hudson Institute’s Aparna Pande, whose book From Chanakya to Modi: Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy, was released on June 17.

 
Column-image

This is the continuing amazing spiritual journey of a Muslim man from Kerala who plunged into Vedic religion after a chance encounter with a Hindu mystic under a jackfruit tree in the backyard of his house when he was just nine. It is a story w...

 
Column-image

History is told by the victors but in our modern age, even contemporary events get - or are given - a slant, where some contributors soon get eclipsed from the narrative or their images tarnished.

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive