FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
‘India’s territorial concerns valid but it can be more flexible on Belt Road Initiative while having red lines’
Posted:May 16, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
BRI is said to involve over 60 countries, 4.4 billion people and 29% of global GDP, with over $1 trillion of Chinese government money. How much of this is hype and how much is real?
 
Whatever numbers we are getting to hear are what is being told to us by the Chinese but the biggest problem with this initiative so far is that it is not very clear where specifically this money will go, in terms of projects. The only element where some details have been provided is CPEC. No other segment has any clarity: on project or whether there will be Chinese companies coming in or whether they will be collaborating on terms of engagement and so on. What the Chinese are trying to do is to take existing projects like Gwadar port in Pakistan or Hambantota in Sri Lanka and saying that these are all part of OBOR. There is a certain degree of lack of transparency and more information and clarity are needed.
 
Otherwise, you might end up with situations where countries that need money for new initiatives, bring in Chinese companies on their terms and then end up discovering that they are in a perpetual debt trap. This has actually happened with Sri Lanka. There are expectations this might happen with Pakistan as well.
 
The majority of countries in the OBOR geography, especially in Central Asia, are all looking for funds and it is quite easy for the Chinese to sell them this carrot of funding for infrastructure and public goods for making OBOR politically legitimate. The only country which can counter this is India. Russia is playing a strategic game as they want to align with China for a variety of reasons.
 
Is India getting support for its stand on the problems with CPEC?
 
India is the only country which has a sovereignty issue with this because of CPEC passing through PoK. India’s grievance is legitimate but CPEC came before they started calling this the Belt Road Initiative. China was aware that India would object but didn’t bother. However, the land part is not the only component of this initiative. There is also a big maritime infrastructure part, which India needs to look at more objectively. India can simply say that we won’t agree to the corridor passing through our territories but on the other aspects of the project we are prepared to discuss. That way you don’t send out a signal to the rest of the community that you are spoiling the show. Unfortunately, no country till now has come out openly in support of India’s concerns.
 
So India can be more flexible while having its red lines?
 
Exactly. That is what we must do. There is no point in driving ourselves into a corner since we won’t get supporters. A third country will go with whatever benefits it. We can negotiate because this project can never be fully successful without India. Purely from geographic and economic perspectives, it can only work if India is there. Our presence in OBOR will also give a sense of comfort to many other countries.
 
How is this being seen in Southeast Asia?
 
BRI is a reasonably big deal in the region and being looked at as an initiative which can recharge economic momentum. No country wants to annoy China. The Nepalese ambassador’s statement sums up the reality where he said we don’t want to cause grief to India but China is an economic giant. You can’t afford not to play ball with them. The ability they have for creating economic damage is substantive.
 
So as the US retreats, China steps in?
 
One of the difficulties we have is that China has started projecting this as part of its effort to push trade and globalisation. That sentiment resonates a lot in Asia. We cannot claim that we are a pro-connectivity country while continuing to create obstacles in trade talks. In the BRI vision document, trade is big with mention of multiple economic zones. It could all be speculative but it is there. We can get isolated on this.
 
Times of India, May 17, 2017
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Relations between India and Peru  are united by El Niño and the monsoon yet separated by vast distances across oceans.  Jorge Castaneda, Ambassador of Peru to India, talks to INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS exclusively about what is bringing the two geographically-apart countries closer.
 
read-more
Indian judge Dalveer Bhandari was re-elected to the International Court of Justice on Monday as the UN General Assembly rallied behind him in a show of force that made Britain  bow to the majority and withdraw its candidate.
 
read-more
Those with a resolve make a big difference to the society. They inspire others to make the best out of a bad situation, steer out of morass with fortitude. Insha Mushtaq, the teenage girl who was pelleted to complete blindness during 2016 emerged as a classic example of courage.
 
read-more
Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama on Sunday said India and China have "great potential" and they could work together at a "practical level".
 
read-more
This week a major United Nations gathering on climate change gets underway in Bonn, Germany.
 
read-more

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's efforts to build India's global appeal for investors seem to have finally yielded returns in terms of the country's performance in the World Bank&rsquo...

 
read-more
Column-image

Title: The People Next Door -The Curious History of India-Pakistan Relations; Author: T.C.A. Raghavan; Publisher: HarperCollins ; Pages: 361; Price: Rs 699

 
Column-image

Could the North Korean nuclear issue which is giving the world an anxious time due to presence of hotheads on each side, the invasion of Iraq and its toxic fallout, and above all, the arms race in the teeming but impoverished South Asian subcon...

 
Column-image

Title: A Bonsai Tree; Author: Narendra Luther; Publisher: Niyogi Books; Pages: 227 Many books have been written on India's partition but here is a firsthand account of the horror by a migrant from what is now Pakistan, who ...

 
Column-image

As talk of war and violence -- all that Mahatma Gandhi stood against -- gains prominence across the world, a Gandhian scholar has urged that the teachings of the apostle of non-violence be taken to the classroom.

 
Column-image

Interview with Hudson Institute’s Aparna Pande, whose book From Chanakya to Modi: Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy, was released on June 17.