FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Belittling a court verdict
Posted:Sep 13, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Frenetic activity has been triggered following the incarceration of two public officials, over the misuse of public funds, with the Joint Opposition seizing the opportunity to whip up mass hysteria, for cheap political gain. Both, messrs. Lalith Weeratunga and Anusha Palpita were sentenced to prison terms and heavily fined by a court of law in Sri Lanka after the High Court judge found them guilty for acting against the laid down law. However, JO stalwarts are going to great lengths to portray this episode as a blatant act of victimization and are even attempting to compare the Bond scam and the disproportionate punishment meted out to the Weeratunga-Palpita duo, juxtaposed with the so-called Central Bank heist maha banku mankollaya, in the words of JO stalwart Bandula Gunawardena.
 
What is more, Mahinda Rajapaksa has gone to the extent of faulting the High Court verdict, arguing that Weeratunga used the Rs. 600 million to purchase sil redi on his orders and that the distribution of same did not take place during an election period but in pursuance of a government policy and that if public officials are prohibited from implementing government policy, they (officials) will be placed in a huge predicament in the future.
 
Rajapaksa, no doubt, would have been closely following the court proceedings in relation to his one-time Secretary and thus could not be unaware of the contents of the testimony of the Election Commissioner Mahinda Deshapriya that the sil redi in question bore the picture of the UPFA Presidential candidate of the January 8, 2015 poll. What then could this be but a blatant election bribe, as eloquently declared by Colombo High Court judge Gihan Kulatunga, in delivering his verdict? Isn’t this a clear case of the former President trying to throw dust in the eyes of the public by dragging in religion into the equation? A lot of brouhaha is also being made by the JO on the issue of the massive fine imposed on the Weeratunga-Palpita duo for distributing a religious item such as sil redi, with Bandula Gunawardena making bold to declare that JO parliamentarians would donate Rs 100,000 each towards the payment of the fine, while also roping in Provincial Councillors and Pradeshiya Sabha members who are each called upon to fork out Rs. 50,000 and 25,000 each, respectively.
 
Here, we have a situation where the country’s law makers, who should know better, holding a court verdict in contempt and treating the due implementation of the law with mock derision. Not only that, they have also co-opted the services of all the temples in the country, with Mahinda Rajapaksa, no less, declaring that special pin ketayas will be opened in all temples, to augment the ‘fine kitty’. Here is an instance where the innocent public have been dealt with a double whammy. Already being defrauded of Rs. 600 million, they are now called upon to voluntarily part with another Rs. 104 million (the Rs. 50 million imposed on each of the convicts, as compensation to the TRC, and the additional Rs. 2 million, each, as fines). This is reminiscent of Mahinda Rajapaksa’s campaign to collect Rs. 1 each from the supporters of the SLFP to pay the court costs imposed on Sirima Bandaranaike after the latter lost her Election Petition filed against President Premadasa.
 
In another instance at obfuscation, Bandula Gunawardena was attempting to contrast the alleged payments made to the LTTE, from public funds, by President Premadasa, with the money released to purchase sil redi. He goes onto say that Paskaralingam who authorized such payment was sitting pretty while Weeratunga has been thrown behind bars. This same allegation was made against the UNP, at the 2001 General Election that followed the premature dissolution of the parliament, but the UNP succeeded in carrying the southern electorate with it. Perhaps, the public was wise to the fact that money released, if ever, by President Premadasa, to the LTTE, was in order to fight the IPKF, who was viewed as a greater threat to the sovereignty of the country than posed by the LTTE.
 
However, the money given to the LTTE by Mahinda Rajapaksa, through the agency of the RADA, headed by a wheeler dealer businessmen, still in the bosom of Rajapaksa, was for an ulterior purpose, viz to undermine democracy, by halting the voters in the North and East from exercising their franchise, which robbed Ranil Wickremesinghe of victory, at the 2005 Presidential Election.
 
Be that as it may, the government should take necessary steps to protect the dignity of the country’s courts from the juvenile acts of politicians. As it is, our courts have suffered enough insults by marauders in saffron robes. Contempt, for court verdicts, have already been on show, with politicians displaying bravado by raising their manacled hands following a court verdict. Making a big song and dance by mobilizing members of the public and the Sangha to pay the court fines on behalf of two individuals, convicted of misusing public funds to the tune of Rs 600 million, do doubt, will be seen by many, as the ultimate insult to the country’s judiciary. 
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Relations between India and Peru  are united by El Niño and the monsoon yet separated by vast distances across oceans.  Jorge Castaneda, Ambassador of Peru to India, talks to INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS exclusively about what is bringing the two geographically-apart countries closer.
 
read-more
Indian judge Dalveer Bhandari was re-elected to the International Court of Justice on Monday as the UN General Assembly rallied behind him in a show of force that made Britain  bow to the majority and withdraw its candidate.
 
read-more
Those with a resolve make a big difference to the society. They inspire others to make the best out of a bad situation, steer out of morass with fortitude. Insha Mushtaq, the teenage girl who was pelleted to complete blindness during 2016 emerged as a classic example of courage.
 
read-more
Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama on Sunday said India and China have "great potential" and they could work together at a "practical level".
 
read-more
This week a major United Nations gathering on climate change gets underway in Bonn, Germany.
 
read-more

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's efforts to build India's global appeal for investors seem to have finally yielded returns in terms of the country's performance in the World Bank&rsquo...

 
read-more
Column-image

Title: The People Next Door -The Curious History of India-Pakistan Relations; Author: T.C.A. Raghavan; Publisher: HarperCollins ; Pages: 361; Price: Rs 699

 
Column-image

Could the North Korean nuclear issue which is giving the world an anxious time due to presence of hotheads on each side, the invasion of Iraq and its toxic fallout, and above all, the arms race in the teeming but impoverished South Asian subcon...

 
Column-image

Title: A Bonsai Tree; Author: Narendra Luther; Publisher: Niyogi Books; Pages: 227 Many books have been written on India's partition but here is a firsthand account of the horror by a migrant from what is now Pakistan, who ...

 
Column-image

As talk of war and violence -- all that Mahatma Gandhi stood against -- gains prominence across the world, a Gandhian scholar has urged that the teachings of the apostle of non-violence be taken to the classroom.

 
Column-image

Interview with Hudson Institute’s Aparna Pande, whose book From Chanakya to Modi: Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy, was released on June 17.