FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
India-China ties: A 'strategic' gulf
Posted:Feb 28, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By C. Uday Bhaskar
 
The India-China bilateral relationship has a distinctive  strategic dimension to it and experts are agreed that the vision of an Asian century unfolding in the 21st century will be determined by the degree to which this bilateral relationship is able to realize its full potential.
 
Over the last three years, both Asian giants have had  new leaders at the helm – President Xi Jinping in China and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in India - and the initial expectation for a more cooperative relationship has floundered. The last year has been particularly testy.
 
China’s reluctance to support India’s membership to the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and Beijing’s  tactic of using a "technical hold" at the UN Security Council on the Pakistan-based terrorist leader Masood Azhar have irked New Delhi visibly. Consequently, over the last year the bilateral relationship has been more brittle than it has over the last decade.
 
Thus, the visit of Indian Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar  to Beijing (February 22)  for the first ‘upgraded’ strategic dialogue had aroused considerable interest and both sides dwelt on the importance of regular high-level consultations.
 
The manner in which the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi  framed the visit is instructive.  In his meeting with Jaishankar, Minister Wang  said: “I am certain that by raising the levels of this strategic dialogue, our two sides will be able to enhance our strategic communication, reduce strategic misunderstanding and build more strategic trust and deepen our strategic cooperation.”
 
The use of the word ‘strategic’ five times was not accidental or a coincidence – but reiterates the underlying  feature of the relationship between the world’s two most populous nations. Wang added:  “And this way, we can better tap into the potential of our bilateral relations and live up to our two nations’ responsibilities to regional and global stability as two important neighbours.”  
 
However despite this expansive ‘strategic’ context to  dialogue,  it is  evident that Jaishankar’s meeting with the  Chinese Executive Vice Minister Zhang Yesui   did not lead to any substantive movement on the more  contentious issues. While there was no  joint statement, in his media  interaction  Jaishankar reiterated Delhi’s  concerns and expectations on the major issues :  namely  NSG  (Nuclear Suppliers' Group) membership ; terrorism related to Masood Azhar and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) .
 
The choice of word and phrase by Jaishankar suggests a level of candour that is new to the contour of the bilateral dialogue.  Traditionally, China is opaque and guarded in its official responses  and given its authoritarian nature of governance, Beijing  is not compelled or convinced about the need for any kind of transparency about bilateral negotiations.
 
In contrast, given its democratic ethos,  the political leadership in India  needs to  be sensitive to public opinion and Jaishanakar’s observations about the CPEC is instructive.  “CPEC violates Indian sovereignty because it runs through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir….therefore since they (China) are a country who have been very sensitive to sovereignty concerns, it is for them to say how a country whose  sovereignty has been violated can come (join CPEC) on an invitation.”
 
China is more favourably positioned  in the bilateral by way of  the significant comprehensive power differential  between the two neighbours and its  status as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).  Paradoxically, even within the UNSC,  the Chinese position both on the NSG membership and the Masood  Azhar case is at variance with the other four members.
 
Currently all the major powers are seeking to comprehend what the Trump-led US foreign policy will prioritize and only then will they be able to consolidate their own position on a range of  global issues.  A certain degree of hedging is therefore inevitable and it appears that both China and India want to keep the lines of communication open – their differences notwithstanding.
 
This is reflected in Jaishankar’s concluding remarks about his Beijing visit: “Overall, I felt my visit was certainly useful in conveying to the Chinese side our concerns and priorities and gaining from them an appreciation and their understanding of the world situation and in what manner we could work together.”
 
(C.Uday Bhaskar is Director, Society for Policy Studies. Comments and suggestions on this article can be sent on: editor@spsindia.in)
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
A Pakistani minister set the proverbial cat amongst India’s foreign policy establishment by announcing that Pakistan was thinking of constitutional changes to make Gilgit-Baltistan its fifth province.
 
read-more
India is well on course to embracing the change brought in by the agent of change -- PM Modi, writes Sanjay Kumar Kar for South Asia Monitor.  
 
read-more
To build a better future for all, the government in Dhaka will have to think about how to ensure inclusive education for all in the country, writes Minhazur Rahman Rezvi for South Asia Monitor.
 
read-more
spotlight image 'Covert military actions or surgical strikes against terror launch pads in Pakistan have limited utility that won't change the mind of the Pakistan Army or the ISI  which sponsor cross-border terrorism
 
read-more
In Dutch politics, alliances are imperative to construct an administration. The post-election government formation is, therefore, a slightly time-consuming process. In due course, a coalition led by the incumbent Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, will surface.  
 
read-more
Japan is a special country in several ways. For centuries, it remained isolated and disconnected with the outside world. But once it opened itself up to the West with the Convention of Kanagawa in 1854 by the use of force by Commodore Matthew Calbraith Perry of the United States Navy, Japan has never looked back. Japan is a spe
 
read-more
Recently, under the leadership of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, and earlier under the late Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Abdallah bin Abdul-Aziz Al-Saud, Saudi Arabia has rolled out a series of women-friendly initiatives.  Recently, under the leadership of Custodian of the
 
read-more
spotlight image Arun Jaitley, with his legal and political acumen, is the best bet for Narendra Modi after Manohar Parrikar, who could also understand technological as well as financial demands of the defence ministry.           
 
read-more
Column-image

India remians the inflexible bête-noir for Pakistan, yet there are few books by Indian authors that have sought to interpret the prodigal neighbour in a holistic, informed and empathetic manner.

 
Column-image

The line that Mortimer Durand drew across a small map in 1893 has bled the Pashtun heart ever since. More than a century later both sides of that line remain restless. But the mystery behind what actually happened on 12 November 1893 has never ...

 
Column-image

What went wrong for the West in Afghanistan? Why couldn't a global coalition led by the world's preeminent military and economic power defeat "a bunch of farmers in plastic sandals on dirt bikes" in a conflict that outlasted b...

 
Column-image

What will be Pakistan's fate? Acts of commission or omission by itself, in/by neighbours, and superpowers far and near have led the nuclear-armed country at a strategic Asian crossroads to emerge as a serious regional and global concern whi...

 
Column-image

Some South African generals, allied with the British forces, sought segregation from the enlisted men, all blacks, after being taken prisoners of war. The surprised German commander told them firmly that they would have to share the same quarte...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive