FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
India’s tit-for-tat approach vis-a-vis China and its implications
Posted:Mar 9, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Pema Tseten Lachungpa
 
The proposed visit of the Dalai Lama to Tawang, a district in the northeastern Indian state of Arunanchal Pradesh has brought another low in the ever growing India-China bilateral relations. Arunachal Pradesh, the easternmost point of Indian territory, has been subjected to dispute over the recognition of the MacMahon line as Beijing claims its jurisdiction over Tawang and claims Arunachal Pradesh as a part of China’s Tibet.
 
In the words of Dai Bingguo, who served as China’s boundary negotiator from 2003 to 2013, the MacMahon line – drawn by the colonial British government -- did respect China’s jurisdiction over the Tawang region of Arunachal Pradesh. In this regard, New Delhi’s permitting the Dalai Lama, the spiritual head of the Tibetan community, to visit the disputed territory despite China’s warning will create a new conundrum in bilateral relations.
 
At one point the philosophy of allowing the Dalai Lama to visit the disputed territory might turn out to be a wrong move in New Delhi’s approach towards Beijing, particularly in the period of India’s pragmatic transformation in the loosely woven globalised world where an ally or good relations can help in the overall growth of the nations. As China is our closest neighbour it can be an answer to many of our problems despite many riddles that surrounds our relations.
 
However, in the interest of India, the proposed visit of the Tibetan spiritual leader signifies New Delhi’s growing realistic approach in the world that is hungry for hegemonic power.
 
In the past years, New Delhi has been significantly pushing and sending its diplomats, including the recent high profile visit made by Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar, to China for a strategic dialogue over the issues of mutual interest in bilateral, regional and international domain, including the banning of Jaish-e-Mohammad Chief Masood Azhar, and acknowledging New Delhi’s membership to the elite Nuclear Suppliers’ Group.
 
But in most cases, the dialogue failed to bring any fruitful outcome as Beijing still remains critical to making an exception for India’s membership in NSG, preferring instead a consensus-based decision for admitting new members which have not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), thereby pursuing a hyphenated approach linking simultaneous inclusion of both India and Pakistan. In the case of banning JeM chief Masood Azhar, Beijing maintains that there is not enough evidence against the Pakistani terrorist and the issue is between India and Pakistan, which should be resolved mutually.
 
Hence, in this developing picture India seeks an alternative path to push its core objective vis-a-vis China. The first such alternative came when India signalled to help Mongolia amid its alienation from China. India’s spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs, Vikas Swarup, said India is “ready to work with the Mongolian people in this time of their difficulty”. This comment is in line with that of Mongolia’s ambassador in India, Gonchig Ganbold, who sought India’s assistance in helping Ulaanbataar out of its current problems with China.
 
The second instance came when a Taiwanese delegation, which included three parliamentarians, among others, visited India in February 2017. The visit elicited a sharp reaction from the foreign ministry of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The official media in Beijing claims that India playing the Taiwan card will suffer losses by challenging China over the sensitive issue since Beijing characterises Taiwan and its associated territories as a province of China. 
 
The third instance came up over the proposed visit of the Dalai Lama to the disputed territory of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh. Beijing holds Dalai Lama as a separatist who is spreading propaganda for Tibet’s independence. Adding to it, China perceives Arunachal Pradesh as part of the larger south China and, therefore, the visit of the Dalai Lama to the disputed territory will increase regional instability bringing further tension in the northeast region which is already witnessing cross-border insurgency problems. 
 
As Beijing is reluctant to give assent to India’s pending issues, New Delhi feels that there is an alternative option of using the Taiwan question or the Dalai Lama issue as a bargaining chip in pressing its demand with China. India knows the complex relations that Beijing has with Taiwan and the Dalai Lama who at times produces an element of surprises and hiccup to China’s national security in foreign policy and geo-strategic realms.
 
India in this regard has taken the best effective measures to use this card in dealing with China over pending issues. But whether this will be in New Delhi’s interest depends on how it will use the card since using the bargaining card might even backfire in other strategic areas where India feels it has control. As an old player who know the how-do of its neighbour India, Beijing will counter and this we are already witnessing in our neighbouring countries.
 
With its development initiative and soft monetary incentives, Beijing is slowly making inroads into our neighbouring countries, particularly in Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Sri Lanka and Nepal where India has major stakes. This is seen as Beijing’s new initiative to trip India’s growing comprehensive national power and influence beyond Asia. 
 
Hence, using the tit-for-tat approach appears to be a good asset for India in dealing with China, but in the process New Delhi should also take into consideration the larger implication that will evolve with the use of this approach.
 
Lastly, India and China are emerging global players who have the assets to conquer its dominance in the globalised world. During this run, it is predictable that none will enjoy holding the second position. As such, there will emerge many challenges and problems in bilateral relations and the only solution to this problem is being constructive which is never ending.
 
(The author is a PhD scholar in the Department of International Relations, Sikkim University, Gangtok. Comments and suggestions on this article can be sent to editor@spsindia.in)
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image India’s Vice President Mohammed Hamid Ansari visited Armenia recently to celebrate 25 years of diplomatic relations between the two countries.
 
read-more
Pakistan said on July 27 that India's stipulation for granting visa to Pakistani nationals were "highly regrettable" and was against diplomatic norms.
 
read-more
In dispatching its  PLA (Peoples Liberation Army)  marines to Djibuti in the Horn of Africa on Wednesday (July 12 ) by amphibious ships, from the southern port of Zhanjiang, China has taken a significant step in enhancing its  trans-border military footprint.
 
read-more
In the last few weeks , spokesman of Government of China have been issuing several statements and  making observations against India that sound like war cry. 1962 war between India and China was mentioned , as a reminder to India of the happenings then, which virtually amount to a warning that events of 1962  could be repeate
 
read-more
Images of Kashmiri separatists walking the corridors of the Prime Minister’s office during Atal Behari Vajpayee’s tenure have been replaced with visuals of Hurriyat Conference leaders being arrested and taken into custody by a central agency.
 
read-more
As Aadhaar becomes the norm in India, and gets skewered for the involuntary nature of its imposition, our northern neighbours, as is their wont, want to do a number that will make this appear benign.
 
read-more
On July 18, the global media carried stories of how Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Naif was ousted from his position and replaced by his cousin, deputy crown prince Mohammed bin Salman.
 
read-more
The alliance that defeated the militant Islamic State group in Mosul was unusual. Fighting alongside the Iraqi army were not only US forces but also Iran-backed militias.
 
read-more
S.T. Lee Distinguished Lecture of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Singapore on "India, ASEAN and Changing Geopolitics”
 
read-more
Column-image

Interview with Hudson Institute’s Aparna Pande, whose book From Chanakya to Modi: Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy, was released on June 17.

 
Column-image

This is the continuing amazing spiritual journey of a Muslim man from Kerala who plunged into Vedic religion after a chance encounter with a Hindu mystic under a jackfruit tree in the backyard of his house when he was just nine. It is a story w...

 
Column-image

History is told by the victors but in our modern age, even contemporary events get - or are given - a slant, where some contributors soon get eclipsed from the narrative or their images tarnished.

 
Column-image

Humans have long had a fear of malignant supernatural beings but there may be times when even the latter cannot compare with the sheer evil and destructiveness mortals may be capable of. But then seeking to enable the end of the world due to it...

 
Column-image

Title: Reporting Pakistan; Author: Meena Menon; Publisher: Viking/Penguin Random House; Pages: 340; Price: Rs 599

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive