FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
India’s tit-for-tat approach vis-a-vis China and its implications
Posted:Mar 9, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Pema Tseten Lachungpa
 
The proposed visit of the Dalai Lama to Tawang, a district in the northeastern Indian state of Arunanchal Pradesh has brought another low in the ever growing India-China bilateral relations. Arunachal Pradesh, the easternmost point of Indian territory, has been subjected to dispute over the recognition of the MacMahon line as Beijing claims its jurisdiction over Tawang and claims Arunachal Pradesh as a part of China’s Tibet.
 
In the words of Dai Bingguo, who served as China’s boundary negotiator from 2003 to 2013, the MacMahon line – drawn by the colonial British government -- did respect China’s jurisdiction over the Tawang region of Arunachal Pradesh. In this regard, New Delhi’s permitting the Dalai Lama, the spiritual head of the Tibetan community, to visit the disputed territory despite China’s warning will create a new conundrum in bilateral relations.
 
At one point the philosophy of allowing the Dalai Lama to visit the disputed territory might turn out to be a wrong move in New Delhi’s approach towards Beijing, particularly in the period of India’s pragmatic transformation in the loosely woven globalised world where an ally or good relations can help in the overall growth of the nations. As China is our closest neighbour it can be an answer to many of our problems despite many riddles that surrounds our relations.
 
However, in the interest of India, the proposed visit of the Tibetan spiritual leader signifies New Delhi’s growing realistic approach in the world that is hungry for hegemonic power.
 
In the past years, New Delhi has been significantly pushing and sending its diplomats, including the recent high profile visit made by Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar, to China for a strategic dialogue over the issues of mutual interest in bilateral, regional and international domain, including the banning of Jaish-e-Mohammad Chief Masood Azhar, and acknowledging New Delhi’s membership to the elite Nuclear Suppliers’ Group.
 
But in most cases, the dialogue failed to bring any fruitful outcome as Beijing still remains critical to making an exception for India’s membership in NSG, preferring instead a consensus-based decision for admitting new members which have not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), thereby pursuing a hyphenated approach linking simultaneous inclusion of both India and Pakistan. In the case of banning JeM chief Masood Azhar, Beijing maintains that there is not enough evidence against the Pakistani terrorist and the issue is between India and Pakistan, which should be resolved mutually.
 
Hence, in this developing picture India seeks an alternative path to push its core objective vis-a-vis China. The first such alternative came when India signalled to help Mongolia amid its alienation from China. India’s spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs, Vikas Swarup, said India is “ready to work with the Mongolian people in this time of their difficulty”. This comment is in line with that of Mongolia’s ambassador in India, Gonchig Ganbold, who sought India’s assistance in helping Ulaanbataar out of its current problems with China.
 
The second instance came when a Taiwanese delegation, which included three parliamentarians, among others, visited India in February 2017. The visit elicited a sharp reaction from the foreign ministry of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The official media in Beijing claims that India playing the Taiwan card will suffer losses by challenging China over the sensitive issue since Beijing characterises Taiwan and its associated territories as a province of China. 
 
The third instance came up over the proposed visit of the Dalai Lama to the disputed territory of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh. Beijing holds Dalai Lama as a separatist who is spreading propaganda for Tibet’s independence. Adding to it, China perceives Arunachal Pradesh as part of the larger south China and, therefore, the visit of the Dalai Lama to the disputed territory will increase regional instability bringing further tension in the northeast region which is already witnessing cross-border insurgency problems. 
 
As Beijing is reluctant to give assent to India’s pending issues, New Delhi feels that there is an alternative option of using the Taiwan question or the Dalai Lama issue as a bargaining chip in pressing its demand with China. India knows the complex relations that Beijing has with Taiwan and the Dalai Lama who at times produces an element of surprises and hiccup to China’s national security in foreign policy and geo-strategic realms.
 
India in this regard has taken the best effective measures to use this card in dealing with China over pending issues. But whether this will be in New Delhi’s interest depends on how it will use the card since using the bargaining card might even backfire in other strategic areas where India feels it has control. As an old player who know the how-do of its neighbour India, Beijing will counter and this we are already witnessing in our neighbouring countries.
 
With its development initiative and soft monetary incentives, Beijing is slowly making inroads into our neighbouring countries, particularly in Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Sri Lanka and Nepal where India has major stakes. This is seen as Beijing’s new initiative to trip India’s growing comprehensive national power and influence beyond Asia. 
 
Hence, using the tit-for-tat approach appears to be a good asset for India in dealing with China, but in the process New Delhi should also take into consideration the larger implication that will evolve with the use of this approach.
 
Lastly, India and China are emerging global players who have the assets to conquer its dominance in the globalised world. During this run, it is predictable that none will enjoy holding the second position. As such, there will emerge many challenges and problems in bilateral relations and the only solution to this problem is being constructive which is never ending.
 
(The author is a PhD scholar in the Department of International Relations, Sikkim University, Gangtok. Comments and suggestions on this article can be sent to editor@spsindia.in)
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Housing and Urban Affairs, Hardeep Singh Puri, is a former top diplomat who retired as India's Permanent Representative at the United Nations. In his new political avatar, as an important minister in the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Puri told INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS that
 
read-more
Chief of General Staff, United Kingdom, Gen Sir Nicholas Carter’s, visit to India in mid-February was covered by Defence Ministry releasing five photographs and not a word on his engagements/itinerary, writes Anil Bhat
 
read-more
Campus placement season is here and the news is that graduates from the top campuses in India, especially the IITs, have received six figure pay packets and job offers in the US. However, looking beyond the top 200 engineering schools in India, pay packets are not looking too promising. The reason is the emergence of new engineering sc
 
read-more
The largest military exercises in Southeast Asia concluded on February 23 in Thailand, after 11 days of drills, social and humanitarian projects and traditional jungle training. A total of 11,075 soldiers from 29 countries participated in the Cobra Gold 2018 training, held in eastern Thailand, reports Efe news.
 
read-more
Maldives President Abdulla Yameen “conveyed that mediation was not wanted at this stage” when UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres spoke to him last week, Guterres's spokesperson Stephane Dujrric confirmed Thursday, writes Arul Louis
 
read-more
Srinivasan leaves his office in Bengaluru where the lights and air-conditioners are switched off when sensors planted inside notice that he is leaving. He is prompted on his e-watch as to how much time it would take for the elevator to arrive on his floor, based on movement-recognition, writes Rajendra Shende
 
read-more

The Indian government is undertaking a project to enhance and install infrastructures related to trade and customs along its northeastern frontier, that include trading points with Bhutan.

 
read-more

Society for Policy Studies in association with India Habitat Centre held a lecture in the “China's Belt and Road Initiative: Nature, Implications and India's Response”

 
read-more
Column-image

What is history? How does a land become a homeland? How are cultural identities formed? The Making of Early Kashmir explores these questions in relation to the birth of Kashmir and the discursive and material practices that shaped it up to the ...

 
Column-image

A group of teenagers in a Karachi high school puts on a production of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible— and one goes missing. The incident sets off ripples through their already fraught education in lust and witches, and over the years ...

 
Column-image

Title: Do We Not Bleed?: Reflections of a 21-st Century Pakistani; Author: Mehr Tarar; Publisher: Aleph Book Company; Pages: 240; Price: Rs 599

 
Column-image

From antiquity, the Muslim faith has been plagued by the portrayal of Muslim men regularly misusing this perceived “right” to divorce their wives instantly by simply uttering “talaq” thrice.

 
Column-image

'Another South Asia!' edited by Dev Nath Pathak makes a critical engagement with the questions about South Asia: What is South Asia? How can one pin down the idea of regionalism in South Asia wherein inter-state relations are often char...