FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
North Korea’s ICBM launch tests Trump administration
Posted:Jul 28, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Joshy M Paul
 
North Korea has successfully test-launched an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on July 4, with nuclear warhead capability. It came down in the Sea of Japan after 37 minutes from an altitude of 2,802 kilometres.  The three-stage KN-08 missile is believed to have a range of over 8,000km and capability to reach continental America.
 
Pyongyang chose July 4, the US Independence Day, to conduct the missile test, as a clear signal that it has the wherewithal to threaten enemies who seek a regime change in North Korea. The test also took place before leaders from the Group of 20 (G 20) nations were due to discuss steps to rein in North Korea’s weapons programme, which it has pursued in defiance of UN Security Council sanctions, at Hamburg, Germany. Clearly this launch is a serious security issue not just for the East Asian region but also challenges the new US Trump administration
 
This missile launch has not only caused a direct Washington-Pyongyang confrontation, but also ruffled US-China relations, as Washington has always depended on China to contain North Korea’s nuclear and missile programmes. The Trump administration has reportedly expressed frustration with China’s inability to curb North Korea’s advancing weapons programme. The President tweeted that “Perhaps China will put a heavy move on North Korea and end this nonsense once and for all!” Although the US proclaimed that it has put pressure on China, North Korea’s top trade partner and ally, to take stern steps to cut off Pyongyang’s economic lifeline, Beijing may not impose harsh sanctions on Pyongyang.
 
North Korea has a robust missile programme which began with Scuds; the first batch reportedly coming via Egypt in 1976. Then it launched an indigenous missile development programme and the first versions of its own missile, called Hwasongs, were tested in 1984 with an estimated maximum range of 1,000km. Now it has various types of missile from medium to intercontinental, and a missile with capability to target the United States tipped with a nuclear warhead is considered to be Pyongyang's ultimate goal.
 
Kim Jong Un believes the US will eventually try to remove him from power, similar to the fate which befell Moammar Gaddafi in Libya and Saddam Hussein in Iraq. The Kim family has always been on the US radar as the North’s sabre-rattling will instigate instability in the Korean Peninsula, and affect security of South Korea and Japan.  Pyongyang is looking for more than they can deliver at the moment, and “could develop an indigenous missile that can reach even Seattle and carry a North Korean-built nuclear warhead before the end of Trump's first term”, said  Michael Hayden,  CIA Director 2006 to 2009.
 
The major worry about North Korea’s missile programme is its nuclear adventurism. It demonstrated its first nuclear weapon test in 2006, after withdrawal from the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 2003. It further conducted four more tests to increase the yield. The latest one conducted in 2016 has an explosive yield of between 10 and 30 kilotonnes, though Pyongyang claims it was of a hydrogen bomb, but experts cast doubts on the claim given the size of the explosion registered. Now it has developed a payload which can carry nuclear warheads to the US.
 
Until now it was a regional security concern, especially for South Korea and Japan, but North Korea has raised the bar to a higher level. Till now the major concern for the international community was whether South Korea and Japan would opt for nuclear weapon status to withstand the threat posed from North Korea, and a regional multilateral mechanism called Six Party Talks was initiated to contain the North Korean threat. Regional countries always want a diplomatic solution to the problem; a war between the US and North Korea would destabilize the entire East Asian region. The major policy was to restrain Pyongyang from taking strong action by imposing sanctions on it. However, these sanctions did not seem a success due to North Korea’s strong economic engagement with China. So the international community has focused on China to defuse the nuclear-cum-missile threat.  But now it has become more of a major security issue of the United States itself.
 
Given the complexity of the problem no one has a clear solution to the problem. North Korea is averse to a diplomatic solution, and prefers to adopt an aggressive posture against South Korea and America. For the United States a war with North Korea would result in a catastrophic situation in the region. Perhaps a limited use of force against the regime or its nuclear facilities: an air strike on North Korea’s nuclear infrastructure or missile facilities with the political objective aim to destabilize Kim Jong Un’s quest for weapons of mass destruction, is dependent on the quality of intelligence inputs both from within and allies. But any overt military action would run the risk that the North Korean regime would interpret the attack as an existential threat and respond with force that could kill millions of people on the Korean Peninsula, and include the 28,500 US troops stationed in South Korea.
 
Eventually, a diplomatic solution is the only option available now for the Trump administration. To do so, Washington would require support from China. However, China believes that Trump has strong anti-China moorings which include the US position over the dispute of South China Sea. So the US will have to wait patiently for Pyongyang’s next step in its confrontation with the West.
  
(Joshy M. Paul is Assistant Professor in International Studies, Christ University, Bengaluru. He can be contacted at joshy.paul@christuniversity.in)
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Indonesia’s President Joko Widodo has confirmed his presence for the occasion. In an exclusive interview with INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS, Indonesia’s Ambassador to India, Sidharto R.Suryodipuro, reminded Nilova Roy Chaudhury that the first Chief Guest for India’s Republic Day celebrations, in 1950, w
 
read-more
The words of Ho Chi Minh  “Nothing is more precious than independence and liberty” rang true for the people of the erstwhile East Pakistan when, with increasing brutality, the West Pakistani oppression spread across the land, writes Anwar A Khan from Dhaka
 
read-more
In a significant boost to New Delhi's Act East Policy, India and Japan set up the Act East Forum on Tuesday as agreed during Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's visit to India this year for the annual bilateral meeting that would help to focus and catalyse development in India's Northeast.
 
read-more
  United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson reiterated on Friday Washington's warning that “all options are on the table” to meet North Korea's nuclear threat while offering to keep the lines of communication with Pyongyang open.
 
read-more
The 15th trilateral meeting of the foreign ministers of Russia, India and China concluded in New Delhi on Monday with many nuanced takeaways embedded in the joint statement of 46 paragraphs. Reiterating that the forum “is not directed against any other country”, the statement underlined the importance of the establishment o
 
read-more
The first thing that one sees when a flight approaches New Delhi is thick smog that envelopes the city and its lack of greenery.  In almost all other major cities of India lack of greenery is the most obvious sight that one sees when approaching it by air.
 
read-more

Pakistan has agreed to allow the rupee to depreciate after holding talks with the International Mone­tary Fund (IMF) on the country's economy.

 
read-more

Two major global changes in the past year; the ‘Brexit’ referendum and the advent of Donald Trump, writes Sandeep Kaur Bhatia

 
read-more

It is also imperative for India to explore other regions for markets. Its trade deficit with Latin America has been narrowing. Also, its trade with Mexico, Colombia and Guatemala has increased, ...

 
read-more
Column-image

Over the last 25 years, India's explosive economic growth has vaulted it into the ranks of the world's emerging major powers. Long plagued by endemic poverty, until the 1990s the Indian economy was also hamstrung by a burdensome regulat...

 
Column-image

Title: A Ticket to Syria; Author: Shirish Thorat; Publisher: Bloomsbury India: Pages: 254; Price: Rs 399

 
Column-image

Gorichen, a majestic peak in the Eastern Himalayas at an altitude of 22,500 feet, is the highest in Arunachal Pradesh. Beautiful to look at and providing a fantastic view from the top, it is extremely tough climb for mountaineers.

 
Column-image

It is often conjectured if the reason for long-standing conflicts and insurgencies, in the developing world, especially South Asia, is not only other powers fishing in troubled waters but also the keenness of arms industries, mostly Western, to...

 
Column-image

Title: The People Next Door -The Curious History of India-Pakistan Relations; Author: T.C.A. Raghavan; Publisher: HarperCollins ; Pages: 361; Price: Rs 699