FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Nuclear arms treaty
Updated:Jul 17, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
Almost 70 years to the day when the world witnessed the devastating impact of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 122 countries have voted decisively to impose a ban on nuclear weapons.       On July 7, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was passed 122 to one as a strong rebuke to countries that possess nuclear weapons. The move is a historic one — although it seems few have taken notice. The treaty could potentially lead us on the route to de-nuclearisation. 
 
While countries which possess nuclear weapons have shown no indication that they will become signatories, it is clear that countries without nuclear weapons have shown their overwhelming support for a world without nuclear weapons. The two biggest nuclear arsenal holders are the US and Russia, which possess about 3,000 nuclear warheads. When the conversation was started in October last year, 40 countries — including the US, France, Britain, China, Pakistan and India — led a boycott of the meeting. The fact that this boycott has been disregarded by those voting shows that the world is ready for a new era without the threat of a nuclear holocaust looming over the world.
 
The argument for nuclear weapons is a circular one. No country argues that it will be the first to use them , but they all maintain that they need them for defensive purposes. The American logic of pointing to the threat of North Korea completely ignores the fact that it is the US that is the only country that has used nuclear weapons on a civilian population. The hypocrisy of such countries is clear. The fact that the UK did not attend, despite its declared commitment to multilateral disarmament, also showed the shallowness of such promises. 
 
While the treaty cannot force any of these countries to disarm unless they become signatories, it does ban the use of nuclear weapons under international law. An important symbolic message that will be delivered to these global powers: the world does not want    nuclear          weapons. The people of the world do not feel       nuclear          weapons make them safer. While the power of a  nuclear          deterrent in the case of countries like Pakistan and India is clear, no one is suggesting that there a political change will not be needed before eliminating     nuclear          weapons altogether. The global security situation has changed, and the 122 countries who voted in favour of the nuclear ban have asked how nuclear weapons act as deterrents. Perhaps it’s time for nuclear nations to stop and think about this seriously.
 
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Relations between India and Morocco go back a millennium with the first recorded links dating to the 14th century, when the famous traveller and writer from Tangier, Ibn Batuta, travelled to India.
 
read-more
US President Donald Trump has said he sees a “critical” role for India in his country's South Asia strategy for fighting terrorism and building up a safe Afghanistan.
 
read-more
On 14 August 1947 Pakistan, consisting of East and West Pakistan, celebrated its independence. The 14th was chosen for the ceremony because Lord Mountbatten who came to Karachi as the Chief Guest had to later leave for Delhi where ot the midnight stroke India was to declare its independence.
 
read-more
The Doklam stand-off and a variety recent opinion pieces in magazines and newspapers draws attention to the poor state of defence policy preparedness and the lack of meaningful higher defence control in India. 
 
read-more
The two ideologically divergent ruling partners - the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) - in Jammu and Kashmir are headed for a showdown as the debate over the abrogation of Article 35A of the Constitution of India heats up.
 
read-more
At the root of the present Doklam crisis is China’s intrusion into Bhutanese territory for its road building projects. These connectivity projects are integral to President Xi Jinping’s dream project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). India and Bhutan were the only two countries that did not participate in the first forum
 
read-more
There are six encouraging and bold pillars in the new US strategy on Afghanistan as outlined by President Donald Trump.
 
read-more
Is the United States threatened by Nazism? The short answer is no, notwithstanding the frightening events in Charlottesville, Virginia, recently.
 
read-more
It is a privilege to be invited to this most prestigious of law schools in the country, more so for someone not formally lettered in the discipline of law. I thank the Director and the faculty for this honour.
 
read-more
Column-image

As talk of war and violence -- all that Mahatma Gandhi stood against -- gains prominence across the world, a Gandhian scholar has urged that the teachings of the apostle of non-violence be taken to the classroom.

 
Column-image

Interview with Hudson Institute’s Aparna Pande, whose book From Chanakya to Modi: Evolution of India’s Foreign Policy, was released on June 17.

 
Column-image

This is the continuing amazing spiritual journey of a Muslim man from Kerala who plunged into Vedic religion after a chance encounter with a Hindu mystic under a jackfruit tree in the backyard of his house when he was just nine. It is a story w...

 
Column-image

History is told by the victors but in our modern age, even contemporary events get - or are given - a slant, where some contributors soon get eclipsed from the narrative or their images tarnished.

 
Column-image

Humans have long had a fear of malignant supernatural beings but there may be times when even the latter cannot compare with the sheer evil and destructiveness mortals may be capable of. But then seeking to enable the end of the world due to it...

 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Archive