FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
Pakistan: Test of US influence and power
Posted:Jan 2, 2018
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Arul Louis
 
Angered by the killing of an American soldier by terrorists in Afghanistan, United States President Donald Trump let off the first Twitter salvo of 2018, bringing into sharp focus Washington's $33-billion problem of Pakistan and its ties to terrorism and anti-American activities. Trump's warning also tests the limits of Washington's influence and power to make Islamabad give up its use of terrorists as proxy.
 
“No more,” Trump ended his New Year morning tweet on Pakistan that also took a swipe at his predecessors, Barack Obama and George W Bush, for “foolishly” aiding Islamabad which thinks of US leaders as “fools.”
 
"They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help," he tweeted, accusing Islamabad of lies and deceit.
 
On Tuesday, the administration's hawk, Permanent United Nations Representative Nikki Haley, emphasised Trump's resolve. “The President is willing to go to great lengths to stop all funding for Pakistan if they continue to harbour and support terrorism,” she declared.
 
If the timing of his 6:12 am tweet on New Year's Day - while the country was barely awake after the midnight celebrations - seemed a puzzle, the provocation was revealed later when US commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson, announced the death of the soldier in Nangarhar province, which borders Pakistan. Four other soldiers were injured in the attack.
 
Trump's “No more” declaration is a restatement of what was already under way – in August the administration had notified Congress that it was withholding $225 million in military aid to Pakistan.
 
Yet, as with all Trump's actions, it is a transactional ploy in the style of a businessman and “No More” isn't the final, irrevocable mandate it would appear.
 
Trump had stepped back once already. In August he said Pakistan has “much to lose” by harbouring terrorists and his administration announced it was holding back aid. But in October after Pakistanis got a US citizen released from Haqqani captivity, Trump tweeted, “Starting to develop much better relations with Pakistan and its leaders. I want to thank them for their cooperation on many fronts.”
 
Trump, who is raising troop levels in Afghanistan, is caught between two needs: Preventing terrorist attacks on US personnel, especially from Islamabad's proxies, while keeping the sea-based supply lines to landlocked Afghanistan open.
 
Pakistan also borders Trump's great foe, Iran, which he took on in his very next tweet.
 
Therefore, Islamabad also has bargaining chips and it will come down to how much each side can give up to keep the uneasy relationship going.
 
In one of the first responses to Trump's tweet, Islamabad banned Lashkar-e-Taiba leader Hafiz Saeed's charitable organisation, Jamaat-ud-Dawa, from collecting donations. But the mastermind of the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai continues to operate freely in Pakistan in defiance of the US, which has put a $10 million bounty on him.
 
The other part of the Trump strategy, brings India into play. He has called for a greater role for India in Afganistan – but mostly as an aid-giver. Ironically, India has been able to fulfill this role only through the Iranian port of Chabahar port.
 
The greater part of the regional role Trump sees for India is in the Indo-Pacific region as a counter-weight to China. That brings China into both the aid and strategic equations with Pakistan that also faces off India, with which Beijing's relationships are often tense.
 
China is emerging as the main economic power in Pakistan through aid, loans and investments.
 
Pakistan is the keystone of Beijing's ambitious One Belt, One Road (OBOR) plan to build a link all the way to Europe. A part of that is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which aims to grow Pakistan’s economy through several billion dollars of investments and aid in several sectors, ranging from infrastructure and irrigation to industry and agriculture.
 
To that extent, Pakistan is becoming less dependent on the US. But mostly the US aid has been mostly unconditional, geared to the military and giving access to technologically advanced armaments.
 
In contrast, China's aid comes at a future cost as a lot of it is in the form of loans and investments.
 
The OBOR and CPEC require protection from terrorists and stability. While this would require Pakistan to control terrorism domestically, it could also suit Beijing to divert terrorists' attention to India, and to a lesser extent to Afghanistan.
 
Simultaneously, China is trying to assume a higher profile in Afghanistan, which could benefit Pakistan. Last month Foreign Ministers Salahuddin Rabbani of Afghanistan, Khawaja Asif of Pakistan and Wang Yi of China met in Beijing. Afghanistan’s Defence Minister Tariq Shah Bahrami also went to Beijing.
 
(Arul Louis is Senior Fellow (Non-Resident), Society for Policy Studies (SPS), New Delhi)
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Thailand will be the coordinating country for India within ASEAN from July. In an exclusive interview with INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS, the fortnightly journal of the Society for Policy Studies (SPS),  Thailand’s Ambassador to India, Chutintorn Gongsakdi, gave a comprehensive view of bilateral relations and
 
read-more
The struggle for autonomy has been going on within the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) from their inception, writes P.D. Rai
 
read-more
As India and the 10-nation ASEAN bloc culminate the commemoration of 25 years of their dialogue partnership with a summit in New Delhi January 25 that all the leaders will attend, India is laying out the crimson carpet to ensure that the first ever Republic Day celebrations at which 10 ASEAN leaders will be Chief Guests, jointly, is a
 
read-more
While warning about the risk of “potential nuclear catastrophe on the Korean Peninsula”, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has said that a “window of opportunity” was still open to avoid war over Pyongyang's nuclear weapons programme.
 
read-more
While appreciating the remarkable turnaround by Indian exports during November 2017, Anil Khaitan, President, PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry said that India has seen a major breakthrough in its exports to China during last few months whereas the surge in imports for Chinese products in Indian market is on deceleration.
 
read-more
“We have a very solid commitment to climate action,” he said. “We cannot be defeated by climate change and we are not yet winning this battle” and the biggest victims of climate change are the developing countries that are members of the Group of 77 (G77).
 
read-more
In a bid to promote trilateral innovation and business opportunities between the US, India, and Israel, Israel-India Technology Group has launched a trilateral fund of $50 million. "We ar...
 
read-more
Column-image

The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has for the first time claimed responsibility for the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in a new book in written by Taliban leader Abu Mansoor Asim Mufti Noor Wali.

 
Column-image

Title: Salafi-Jihadism -The History of an Idea; Author: Shiraz Maher; Publisher: Penguin Random House UK: Pages: 292; Price: Rs 499

 
Column-image

A Review of Anatomy of Failure by Harlan K. Ullman (Naval Institute Press, 242 pages)

 
Column-image

Title: The Beckoning Isle; Author: Abhay Narayan Sapru; Publisher: Wisdom Tree; Pages: 157; Price: Rs 245

 
Column-image

Title: India Now And In Transition; Editor: Atul Thakur ; Publisher: Niyogi Books: Pages: 448; Price: Rs 599