Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies

Qatar Blockade: West Asian, Gulf states hurting themselves
Posted:Jun 14, 2017
increase Font size decrease Font size
By N.S.Venkataraman
The move by Arab nations like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and UAE to impose an economic and civil blockade against Qatar, to settle scores and perhaps, satisfy their egos, left observers aghast. The four nations justified the blockade by claiming that Qatar has been supporting Islamist terrorist groups like al Queda, Muslim Brotherhood and Daesh, and has been courting Iran.
The UAE has tightened the squeeze on Qatar, threatening anyone publishing any expression of sympathy towards the state with up to 15 years of imprisonment.
While one can understand objections to support for terrorist groups, if present there, how do they object to friendly relations with a sovereign country like Iran?
A careful observer would think that such steps by Saudi Arabia and three others against Qatar amount to ‘biting one’s nose to spite the face’. This is a flawed strategy, devoid of any appreciation of global trade and economic compulsions and mutual dependence of countries in the West Asian region.
This also exposes the fact that the countries that imposed economic blockade on Qatar have not carefully assessed their strength and weakness and the vulnerable situation they face.
Who is not guilty of harbouring terrorists?
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and UAE have accused Qatar of harbouring terrorist groups.
Until recently, USA has been accusing both Saudi Arabia and Qatar of supporting, even promoting terrorism.
In recent years, there have been complaints against Saudi Arabia and some other countries in the region for providing funds and support to Islamist groups, which have enabled several terrorist groups to launch attacks on Jammu & Kashmir in India, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Saudi Arabia has a running conflict with Iran, which it accuses of supporting secessionist forces. Iran itself was recently attacked by IS terrorists who bombed some prime targets, including Iran’s Parliament.
Pakistan has suffered severe terrorist attacks in recent months, but Pakistan itself is suspected of accommodating several lethal terrorist groups.
The isolation of Qatar would result in disruption of supply of products like polymers from Qatar. It would also hit Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.
Qatar produces around 2 million metric tonnes of polyethylene annually, accounting for over 2% of worldwide supply. The country’s three polyethylene producers—Qapco, Qatofin, and Q-Chem—export a combined 85,000 to 90,000 metric tonnes of polyethylene per year to Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. With the blockade, these export volumes will be hit. Termination of imports from Qatar will compel these countries to seek alternative sources of supply.
A large portion of Qatar’s polymer exports are transhipped at the port of Jebel Ali, UAE. The Dubai-controlled port has continued to ship Iranian polymers through many political crises and it will suffer severely in case of exports from Qatar being blocked.
The blockade would badly hurt international trade in petrochemicals and polymers, particularly when the dispute escalates to a complete shipping blockade on Qatar, which accounts for a large share of global trade, as most of its output is exported.
Such steps against Qatari ports would halt the export of petrochemicals and polymers, severely disrupting the supply-demand balance of several products globally and increase spot prices.
The blockade would badly hit the international market for vinyls, methanol, and methyl tert-butyl ether. Qatari producers export 300,000 metric tonnes of vinyl chloride monomer, 150,000 metric tonnes of ethylene dichloride and 250,000 metric tonnes of caustic soda every year. India, which imports natural gas from Qatar, would be severely affected.
Workers from around the world, who work in Qatar, would lose their jobs.
With levels of inter-dependence between countries so high, no single country can act adversely against another country without suffering consequences.
All the West Asian countries are heavily dependent on each other for varieties of needs. They need to co ordinate their efforts to get their due place in the global market and exercise appropriate influence around the world.
While West Asian countries have enormous oil and gas resources, which they largely export, they have also set up large petro-based derivative products. What is conspicuous is that West Asian states, including Qatar, are heavily dependent on multi-national companies for technology support and operating those plants, which are often joint ventures.
Multi-national companies operating in the region seek to export their products around the world. The blockade of Qatar would hurt their marketing plans.
By such a counter-productive conflict among themselves, they would only strengthen the market base and economy for other countries like China and USA, which may undo the advantages that West Asian countries now enjoy.
It is in the world’s interest that terrorist activities be stopped forthwith and terrorists groups, whatever their ideology, be wiped out.
If any country encourages terrorists, then it behoves the rest of the world to join to make such countries behave, through United Nations. Unilateral action, like that initiated by the four countries against Qatar,cause suspicion and misgivings.
Being driven to the wall, isolated Qatar would have to talk with Turkey, Iran and others to secure food and water supplies. In the process, West Asia would be further divided, not serving the interest of any regional country.
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE and Bahrain have moved beyond acceptable limits and Qatar will not forget this blockade soon. A feeling of near permanent hatred has been planted.
(The author is with ‘Nandini’ Voice for the Deprived. Comments and suggestions on this article can be sent to editor@spsindia.in)
increase Font size decrease Font size

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
spotlight image Sergio Arispe Barrientos, Ambassador of  Bolivia to India is, at 37, the youngest head of mission in New Delhi. Only the second envoy from his country to India, Barrientos, who presented his credentials to the Indian President last month, feels he has arrived at a propitious time, when India’s focus is on so
India is the world's biggest importer of weapons, accounting for 12 percent of global purchases during the past five years because it is not able to produce enough arms to meet its requirements, according to the authoritative Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, writes Arul Louis  
While most Indians were observing recent domestic political developments; with surprise defeats for the ruling BJP in its pocket boroughs and a likelihood of the opposition uniting against the Party for the 2019 national elections, writes Tridivesh Singh Maini
Before the independence of Mauritius from Britain in 1968, the Chagos archipelago was separated as part of the “British Indian Ocean Territory” in 1965, and retained by the UK, writes Priya Pillai
Famous for its pursuit of Gross National Happiness, Bhutan has a new cause for joy: In recognition of its Gross National Income (GNI) growth and social development, the kingdom is poised to graduate from the UN category of the world's poorest known as the Least Developed Countries (LDC), writes Arul Louis
Prem Sharma sells gutka (a combination of betel nuts, tobacco and mouth freshener) and cigarettes near the Vijay Nagar square in Indore, the commercial capital of the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh. However, the most visible part of his tiny business is the dustbin that he does not dare to lose. The case is similar with pretty

While India has regained its position as the world’s fastest growing large economy – with the uptick in GDP expansion at 6.7% in Q3 of 2017-18 – sustaining it critically depend...


What is history? How does a land become a homeland? How are cultural identities formed? The Making of Early Kashmir explores these questions in relation to the birth of Kashmir and the discursive and material practices that shaped it up to the ...


A group of teenagers in a Karachi high school puts on a production of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible— and one goes missing. The incident sets off ripples through their already fraught education in lust and witches, and over the years ...


Title: Do We Not Bleed?: Reflections of a 21-st Century Pakistani; Author: Mehr Tarar; Publisher: Aleph Book Company; Pages: 240; Price: Rs 599


From antiquity, the Muslim faith has been plagued by the portrayal of Muslim men regularly misusing this perceived “right” to divorce their wives instantly by simply uttering “talaq” thrice.


'Another South Asia!' edited by Dev Nath Pathak makes a critical engagement with the questions about South Asia: What is South Asia? How can one pin down the idea of regionalism in South Asia wherein inter-state relations are often char...