FB   
 
Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies
 
 

 
We are not in 1962 and we are militarily strong, but India canít afford a piecemeal approach to Doklam style events
Updated:Jul 7, 2017
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 
By Manmohan Bahadur
 
The ongoing ‘skirmishes’ in the Doklam plateau have been engaging India’s attention as a behaviour that is ‘different from normal’ on part of the Chinese – assertive, provocative and obdurate. That a third party, Bhutan, is involved adds to the murkiness. A closer look, however, shows it as no different from Sun Tzu’s principle of strategic deception.
 
In 1999, two colonels of the People’s Liberation Army, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, wrote in their book, Unrestricted Warfare, how China should prosecute future wars. Stating that “the first rule of unrestricted warfare is that there are no rules, with nothing forbidden,” they suggested a multi-pronged approach to attack the target country’s vitals in all spheres – diplomatic, political, social and of course military.
 
That this got an official sanction of sorts got indicated by the decision of the central military commission in 2003 to have a three warfare concept – psychological, media and legal; a development conveyed to the US Congress by their defence department in a 2011 report. It was further analysed and expanded to mean warfare in multiple spheres – like financial, ecological, technological, trade, media, economic aid and international law. Did this gameplan play out at Chumar and Depsang earlier, and is it now driving events in Dokalam?
The Depsang intrusions took place before the Indian foreign minister was to attend the ministerial conference on Afghanistan at Almaty, Kazakhstan. Thereafter, ever since an assertive government took office in Delhi, one can discern continuation of this trend to keep it occupied with multiple pin pricks.
 
The Chumar intrusions happened while President Xi Jinping was with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad. Reportedly, the Chinese withdrew after having achieved two objectives: first, a message that they would rake up the border issue as and when it suits them to keep our diplomatic and military establishments embroiled in expending energies and second, the intrusions played on India’s sensitivities of the 1962 debacle to put a lingering doubt in the general public’s mind – all to psychologically dilute the muscular approach of the government in Delhi.
 
The Doklam incident is following a similar pattern as earlier: create a controversy by an intrusion and milk the brouhaha created in the raucous Indian media to strike the general national mood through psychological warfare – that it has coincided with the PM’s trips to the US and Israel is also no coincidence.
 
A new first has been added this time with the Global Times, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China, stating that “Beijing should reconsider its stance over the Sikkim issue” and “although China recognised India’s annexation in 2003, it can readjust its stance on the matter.” This has introduced a new element of subversive warfare as the editorial further adds that, “since some Chinese support Sikkim’s independence, the voices will spread and fuel pro-independence appeals in Sikkim.”
 
This could represent an escalation showing intent but may not necessarily be true. However, a new front may have opened, and even if the Doklam situation gets diffused, this is an argument that the Chinese can reopen any time and address us through their three warfare concept – psychological, media and legal.
 
China has fished in India’s troubled northeast since long and our internal governance has not helped matters. With the Gorkha agitation having restarted in the hills of Darjeeling, next door to Sikkim, the ‘Sikkim-independence’ statement by China should not be ignored. It also confirms the unrestricted warfare strategy of China to engage with an adversary in myriad forms of warfare listed earlier.
 
So, as China tries to apply the geo-political squeeze by its strategy of drowning our neighbours through ‘loan warfare’ (Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Bangladesh, with Nepal to follow) and making them indebted to it, India’s political establishment has its work cut out.
 
The defence minister has stated that we are not in 1962, and for sure we are militarily strong, but Doklam style events must be acknowledged for their long term effects and a ‘whole of government’ approach adopted – this involves planning at the strategic level and a coordinated implementation of an action plan by all arms of the government. A piecemeal approach, and feeling happy on termination of each individual crisis, would only be detrimental to India’s long term strategic interests.
 
 
 
 
 
Print
Share
  
increase Font size decrease Font size
 

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
Review
 
 
 
 
spotlight image Thailand will be the coordinating country for India within ASEAN from July. In an exclusive interview with INDIA REVIEW & ANALYSIS, the fortnightly journal of the Society for Policy Studies (SPS),  Thailand’s Ambassador to India, Chutintorn Gongsakdi, gave a comprehensive view of bilateral relations and
 
read-more
The struggle for autonomy has been going on within the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) from their inception, writes P.D. Rai
 
read-more
As India and the 10-nation ASEAN bloc culminate the commemoration of 25 years of their dialogue partnership with a summit in New Delhi January 25 that all the leaders will attend, India is laying out the crimson carpet to ensure that the first ever Republic Day celebrations at which 10 ASEAN leaders will be Chief Guests, jointly, is a
 
read-more
The United Nations Security Council concluded a fact-finding mission to Afghanistan in a show of support for the war-torn nation where it denounced the activities of terrorists there, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) announced Monday.
 
read-more
While appreciating the remarkable turnaround by Indian exports during November 2017, Anil Khaitan, President, PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry said that India has seen a major breakthrough in its exports to China during last few months whereas the surge in imports for Chinese products in Indian market is on deceleration.
 
read-more
“We have a very solid commitment to climate action,” he said. “We cannot be defeated by climate change and we are not yet winning this battle” and the biggest victims of climate change are the developing countries that are members of the Group of 77 (G77).
 
read-more
In a bid to promote trilateral innovation and business opportunities between the US, India, and Israel, Israel-India Technology Group has launched a trilateral fund of $50 million. "We ar...
 
read-more
Column-image

Title: Salafi-Jihadism -The History of an Idea; Author: Shiraz Maher; Publisher: Penguin Random House UK: Pages: 292; Price: Rs 499

 
Column-image

A Review of Anatomy of Failure by Harlan K. Ullman (Naval Institute Press, 242 pages)

 
Column-image

Title: The Beckoning Isle; Author: Abhay Narayan Sapru; Publisher: Wisdom Tree; Pages: 157; Price: Rs 245

 
Column-image

Title: India Now And In Transition; Editor: Atul Thakur ; Publisher: Niyogi Books: Pages: 448; Price: Rs 599

 
Column-image

Title: The Power Paradox; Author: Dacher Keltner; Publisher: Penguin Random House UK: Pages: 208; Price: Rs 499