Powered bysps
        Society for Policy Studies

Will the ghosts of 2014 revisit the next parliamentary elections?
Posted:Jan 5, 2018
increase Font size decrease Font size
By Ziauddin Choudhury
The elections of January 2014 brought about a maverick chapter in our democracy.
Preceded by nearly 100 days of strikes, road blockades, arson, and unsurpassed political mayhem, the elections had the lowest voter turnout on record (officially 38%, but 22% from international watchers).
More than half of the parliamentary seats were uncontested because the main opposition, BNP, boycotted the elections, leading to a ruling party domination by default and absolute majority in the parliament.
The opposition declared the elections a sham, international observers decried the authenticity of the elections, but the government prevailed, and a new government was sworn in railroading through the denunciation and condemnation.
The January 5 elections were held at a great cost to the economy and people at large. According to a report in the Australian press (quoting Bangladesh Human Rights group Ain O Salish Kendra) a total of 507 people were killed in violence in Bangladesh in 2013. The cost to the economy from strikes and blockades amounted to Tk11,000 crore the same year according to the World Bank.
For a long time, the trauma of violence and political virulence between the contending parties would remain around to haunt the nation.
The successful conclusion of the elections despite the fire and fury of the time was more due to the stoicism of the common people and their collective decision to stay away from voting — the low turnout proved that — than due to the ability of the government to conduct the elections.
The hostility and bloodshed over nearly a year before the elections had stunned people to numbness.
They had seen nothing like this in the decades before. The opposition wanted to acquire power by forcing the government to agree to their demands, and the ruling party wanted to retain power.
Ironically, all of the violence and mayhem were carried out in the name of democracy.
While the main opposition, along with an array of smaller opposition parties such as Jatiya Party led by General Ershad, boycotted the elections (although Ershad later reneged on his pledge not to participate), the government went ahead stubbornly with the elections.
According to statistics reported internationally, a total of 39 people died in the weekend of the elections either from violence or by police fire, and 150 election centres were burned by the opposition.
The opposition boycott yielded a bonanza for the ruling party which won 232 out of 300 seats in the parliament.
This was an unprecedented election in the history of the country as more than half of the seats were uncontested. For the first time we had a “democratically” elected parliament where more than half the electorate did not vote for their representatives.
The government that took over that day was not a successor government but a continuation of the previous government except that it went through a costly process of elections that were more a virtual reality than really real.
A major obstacle to holding a participatory and inclusive election again appears to be the BNP demand for an independent caretaker government to hold the elections — a demand that raises a red flag
People had already concluded that the elections were not for them, but between two parties and their acolytes who have anything but people in their mind. It was a play between two players for power where people were hostages.
Four years have passed since the extraordinary elections of 2014, and we are hearing the bells of another election in less than a year.
Although, in the initial months, there were speculations of a second round of elections to allay international criticism, the government successfully deflected these pressures primarily because there was not much internal pressure to hold another set of elections.
People were not ecstatic about having another series of violent encounters between government and the opposition. The external outcry for fresh inclusive elections also faded mainly because our big neighbour had actually endorsed the elections with its silence on this score.
As we approach a possible round of parliamentary elections in less than a year, we wonder if our political leaders and political parties learned any lesson from the violence of 2013 and the Pyrrhic victory of January 5, 2014.
What should be clear to anyone with hindsight and foresight are three things: One, people abhor violence and force in the exercise of their democratic rights to vote. Two, democracy is all about freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Three, these are essential conditions for holding any election.
Holding the elections in a democratic manner is the responsibility of the government; but the opposition has an equal responsibility to honour its obligations to observe democratic norms when asking for these elections.
These include not resorting to hostility to express its differences with the government or incite people to violence to attain its demands.
A major obstacle to holding a participatory and inclusive election again appears to be the BNP demand for an independent caretaker government to hold the elections — a demand that raises a red flag before the government. Our wishful thinking of an inclusive election may again fall on its face if the opposition sticks to its demand steadfastly.
There are many ways to resolve conflicts between political parties and leaders if the common goal is to hold elections peacefully and democratically.
But stubbornness or unwillingness to accommodate each other is not one of them. We have seen the terrible cost of such stubbornness in 2013-14. We do not want a reprisal of the past.
Let us hope that our leaders and the political parties learnt from 2014 and would be guided by not repeating the missteps of the past. Let 2018 bring a new awakening for them and for us as a nation.
increase Font size decrease Font size

Disclaimer: South Asia Monitor does not accept responsibility for the views or ideology expressed in any article, signed or unsigned, which appears on its site. What it does accept is responsibility for giving it a chance to appear and enter the public discourse.
Comments (Total Comments 0) Post Comments Post Comment
spotlight image Sergio Arispe Barrientos, Ambassador of  Bolivia to India is, at 37, the youngest head of mission in New Delhi. Only the second envoy from his country to India, Barrientos, who presented his credentials to the Indian President last month, feels he has arrived at a propitious time, when India’s focus is on so
On February 15, 2017 Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV-C37) successfully launched the 714 kg Cartosat-2 series satellite along with 103 co-passenger satellites from Satish Dhawan Space Centre, Sriharikota. 12 minutes later, writes Anil Bhat
While most Indians were observing recent domestic political developments; with surprise defeats for the ruling BJP in its pocket boroughs and a likelihood of the opposition uniting against the Party for the 2019 national elections, writes Tridivesh Singh Maini
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday talked over telephone and pledged to deepen bilateral ties and promote mutual trust, writes Gaurav Sharma 
Famous for its pursuit of Gross National Happiness, Bhutan has a new cause for joy: In recognition of its Gross National Income (GNI) growth and social development, the kingdom is poised to graduate from the UN category of the world's poorest known as the Least Developed Countries (LDC), writes Arul Louis
With a dire warning about the looming future of a waterless world, Indian spiritual leader Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev made a plea for mobilising humanity to save the rivers of India and the world before it is too late, writes Arul Louis

While India has regained its position as the world’s fastest growing large economy – with the uptick in GDP expansion at 6.7% in Q3 of 2017-18 – sustaining it critically depend...


A recent novel "Radius 200" by author Veena Nagpal has two facts at the centre of the fictional narrative that she weaves. "Impending water scarcity and the very real danger of an Sino-Indian conflict over this precious resource,...


What is history? How does a land become a homeland? How are cultural identities formed? The Making of Early Kashmir explores these questions in relation to the birth of Kashmir and the discursive and material practices that shaped it up to the ...


A group of teenagers in a Karachi high school puts on a production of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible— and one goes missing. The incident sets off ripples through their already fraught education in lust and witches, and over the years ...


Title: Do We Not Bleed?: Reflections of a 21-st Century Pakistani; Author: Mehr Tarar; Publisher: Aleph Book Company; Pages: 240; Price: Rs 599


From antiquity, the Muslim faith has been plagued by the portrayal of Muslim men regularly misusing this perceived “right” to divorce their wives instantly by simply uttering “talaq” thrice.