Culture and rights

Oct 3, 2017
Preservation and promotion of culture is becoming increasingly difficult in rural Bhutan. While we continue to give special importance to the cardinal pillars of Gross National Happiness, the changing society is grappling with new challenges.
Some communities far from the dazzling lights of the cities are today facing serious shortage of people to perform cultural dances and songs. Last month, in Kamdar in Lhuentse, a family was sued by the community members for refusing to participate in the community’s dance festival.
The festival called Drochhung had faded away quietly. The people of Kamdar, Tangmachu, and Phagedung brought it back. Local leaders argued that preserving and promoting local cultures and traditions is important. But the family that the communities sued did not see it that way. They, the members of the family, felt that they were bullied.
Sherab Dema, the daughter of the-once Dropon (lead dancer), was this week fined Nu 100,000 for refusing to participate in the village festival. The villagers wouldn’t have it that Sherab Dema’s father is now too old and physically challenged to be able to perform at the festival.
Nu 100,000 is no small amount for farmers. Sherab Dema has agreed to pay the fine. What this tells us is that the family really had no option.
If preservation and promotion of culture should come to this, it will be very costly for the people in the future. Young people are increasingly leaving their villages and coming to towns and cities for better life and economic opportunities. Aging parents back home can do only so much. Some cultures are so dying quietly. Many have already vanished.
As our society evolves, cultures will meet and melt. That’s bound to happen. Our unique national dress, language, and some common cultures will be all that will define us in the long run. It’s happening.
Efforts to preserve local cultures are important, but changing times will come with unique demand of their own. Making each member of a community to take equal part even as he or she is unable to is not sustainable. It is not sensible. It is Kamdar today. Tomorrow it could be some other villages.
Community vitality can only be nurtured. It cannot be forced.
What about individual rights then?
Kuensel Online, September 30, 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tackling e-waste: UNSW's Indo-Australian scientist offers to help India

Indo-Australian scientist Veena Sahajwalla, whose pioneering invention of the world’s first micro factory to tackle e-waste has generated global attention, says the technology can be deployed in areas of Delhi like Seelampur and Mayapuri, home to hundreds of MSMEs, to help ‘kabadiwallas’, the traditional waste collect


India’s urban agenda one of the defining projects of 21st century: Minister

“India’s urban agenda will constitute one of the defining projects of the 21st century,” Housing and Urban Affairs Minister Hardeep Puri told the High Level Political Forum on ...

Tweets about SAMonitor
SAM Facebook