The new Urban Development Minister, Hardeep Singh Puri, an experienced diplomat and bureaucrat, has his task cut out in fulfilling an agenda that is apparently dear to the Prime Minister, writes Tarun Basu for South Asia Monitor
By Tarun Basu
In June 1990 when, as a member of a media delegation, I had travelled with then Prime Minister V.P. Singh to Kuala Lumpur for a multilateral summit, everyone in the Indian delegation was quite impressed with the modern, vibrant look of Malaysia's capital -- its clean wide roads and sidewalks, its impressive city centre, the rapid growth of skyscrapers and a perceptive good quality of civic life.
On our way back to New Delhi, as Singh, then just a few months old in the job and on his first foreign trip as head of the Indian government, chatted with senior journalists, I happened to remark about the transformation of Kuala Lumpur -- from a languid colonial outpost to one of the top cities of Asia. While there was a worldwide trend of city regeneration, Indian cities seemed to be only degenerating, I remarked. Did he, at the head of a new government, have any plan in mind for regeneration of our decrepit, overcrowded and chaotic cities, I asked.
The Prime Minister thought for a while and then remarked: "Yes, I think we should appoint a high-powered committee to look into this." The stunning banality of the remark then floored me. But, to be fair to Singh, he did try to initiate thinking on structural reforms but his government was too short-lived to make any headway.
Other than the country's first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who had a larger vision of where he wanted to see the country go and who gave India its first planned city in Chandigarh by assigning the job to one of the most international architects of the time in Le Corbusier, no other Prime Minister -- till perhaps Narendra Modi in recent times -- has had time or policy orientation to develop a blueprint for growth of its cities.
This was even as a steady migration from rural to urban India made them burst at their seams, led to unchecked proliferation of slums, deterioration of city infrastructure and abject failure of municipal corporations to live up to the challenges -- whether urban flooding in Mumbai, dengue in Delhi or cratered roads in Bengaluru. An eminent doctor died after falling into an uncovered Mumbai manhole, two people died after a trash mountain collapsed on them on the edge of Delhi, cleaners without protective gear die regularly in open sewers while people dying from building collapses across the country are too numerous to mention.
One of the main problems in the capital, as perhaps elsewhere, are the multiplicity of city authorities who have little imagination or domain knowledge, often work at cross-purposes or keep passing the buck. The hapless citizen is always the victim, not knowing which authority to turn to for a particular grievance, or whom to hold responsible or accountable when things go wrong with roads, pavements, gardens, power, water, drains or sanitation.
"The massive outbreak of mosquito-borne diseases in Delhi underscores the importance of systemic reforms promised by (Prime Minister Narendra) Modi. At the root of the malaise is an oversized, outdated and lethargic bureaucracy," wrote Ashish Khetan, a journalist-turned-leader of the Aam Admi Party government that rules Delhi but with little powers over civic governance, last year.
How do other cities in the world deal with such crises? First, the system everywhere is geared to be responsive to citizens' needs, grievances and well-being. There are multiple agencies, of course, dealing with different subjects, but they all work in perfect coordination under a single authority -- the city mayor, a powerful elected official who selects his own team of qualified administrators who are primed to deliver.
In London, for instance, a city most well-heeled Indians are familiar with, the directly elected mayor, Pakistani-origin Sadiq Khan, works with two deputy mayors, both of Indian origin, and presides over a governing council that has representations from the police, fire service, city maintenance, garden authority, sanitation, waste disposal, etc. And when a crisis of any kind breaks, it's the mayor who takes charge and fixes issues.
In New York, when a crisis happens it is the mayor, Bill de Blasio, who speaks and acts for the city and its citizens -- and not a multitude of voices shifting responsibilities.
Such is the case in most of the world's modern cities, west to east. And there are civic and city laws that are strictly implemented, and respected by its citizenry. If anyone were to flout the law, the system comes down heavily on them -- without exceptions. And this applies to traffic violations, city littering, vandalising public walls, damaging public infrastructure or indulging in any civic indiscipline or infraction.
The new Urban Development Minister, Hardeep Singh Puri, an experienced diplomat and bureaucrat, has his task cut out in fulfilling an agenda that is apparently dear to the Prime Minister. In one of his first public pronouncements, Puri announced enhanced funds for modernised waste management services in the capital. But unless there is a perceptible shift in the government's strategy geared to urban transformation, by overhauling urban governance and making it geared for better service delivery, mere budgetary support will be throwing public money into an inept and corrupt municipal cesspool.
Delhi is projected to have the fastest growth of any city in Asia and Indian cities are set to expand the most across the region, according to a study from Oxford Economics which ranked Asia's 30 largest cities. But are these cities geared to cater to the needs of their expanding businesses, workforce and families?
Gautam Bhatia, an eminent architect and town planner, recently described Indian cities as a "minefield of disasters waiting to happen". According to another study, top Indian metro cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Bengaluru are among the most stressed in the world. If the government and city administrators don't watch out and plan optimally for the future, Indian cities and their swelling inhabitants will have to brace for apocalyptic times, far removed from the "acche din" (good days) the Prime Minister had promised to the country before the elections.
(The author is President, Society for Policy Studies. He can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org)