Bhutan

Is corporatisation a panacea for specialist retention?

Aug 11, 2017
The government’s recent announcement at the meet the press session on the corporatisation of Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital (JDWNRH) as a solution to retain specialists may be easier said than done.
 
The arguments advanced for the corporatisation is to get away from the clutches of the Royal Civil Service Commission (RCSC) so that higher salary or allowances could be paid. This is only based on the assumption that specialists leave the system due to low salary or allowance.  But one can suspect that the issue is beyond financial incentives alone.
 
In national interest, the issue merits an in-depth study by the commissioned committee before embarking on a decision to make JDWNRH a corporation.  JDWNRH enjoys a special status and is at the centre of health services in Bhutan. It has a direct relevance to the mandate of the health ministry.  Once it is corporatised, made into a State Owned Enterprise (SOE), and bound by the Companies Act of Bhutan 2016, the ministry may have complicated relations with JDWNRH once it’s severed from the civil service’s umbilical cord and made a commercial entity.
 
The Constitution states that the State shall provide free access to basic public health services in both modern and traditional medicines. This constitutional mandate may not go down well with the commercialisation of a core institute such as the JDWNRH, which is the apex and epicenter of health services in the country.
 
A pertinent issue that would arise with corporatisation would be the equation between health workers, including specialists and doctors, of JDWNRH and other hospitals/BHUs in the country. Or are all health workers going to be with the JDWNRH?
 
If the strategy is to retain specialists through better salary and allowances, the government has the legal option to capitalise on the provision in the Civil Service Act of Bhutan. Section 55 of the Act states, “Salary, allowances, benefits and other emoluments of the civil servants shall be determined by the Royal Government as per the Constitution.” As there is a system of paying allowances for scarce professions even now, it may be worthwhile to explore this option before venturing into corporatisation.
 
The efforts made by the government to address the specialist shortage issue are appreciated. However, getting the strategy wrong could bring much bigger problems in the health sector and the health of the public at large.
 
Kuensel Online, August 11, 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In northeast India, water-management practices to deal with climate change

In a small village on the north bank of the Brahmaputra in Assam in northeast India, farmer Horen Nath stood gazing at his partially submerged paddy field. The floods had kept their annual date but mercifully, the farmer said, the waters have started receding. "The weather has become very strange of late. We always had ample rain,

Read more...

UAE, Saudi Arabia can help India meet any oil deficit, says UAE envoy

Even as the US-imposed sanctions on Iran has put India’s energy security in jeopardy, United Arab Emirates Ambassador to India Ahmed Albanna has allayed fears of an oil shortage, saying hi...

Read more...
Tweets about SAMonitor
SAM Facebook