Books

Three reasons behind poverty in India

 

A former Indian civil servant, who is currently a professor of Public Policy and Political Science at Duke University, US spent long periods in distant villages and city slums of India. The result? A scholarly book that presents possible solutions to the problems of destitution and inequity in India.

Jun 5, 2017
By Saket Suman
 
A former Indian civil servant, who is currently a professor of Public Policy and Political Science at Duke University, US spent long periods in distant villages and city slums of India. The result? A scholarly book that presents possible solutions to the problems of destitution and inequity in India.
 
Delving into the lives of ordinary individuals, Anirudh Krishna realised there is a lot of latent talent in parts of the country but individuals in these situations do not have the opportunity to rise to a level commensurate with their capabilities.
 
In his just-released book "The Broken Ladder: The Paradox and the potential of India's One Billion" (Penguin / Rs 599 / 382 pages), Krishna has narrowed down upon three factors that, according to him, combine to keep poverty alive in India.
 
The first factor, perhaps the most important one, is the question of poverty creation. Krishna reminded that one-third of all those who are poor today were not born poor, they fell into poverty because of different reasons. The author lamented that bad health and high treatment costs play a very large role in turning people poor in India.
 
"It is estimated that between 3 and 5 percent of the population fall into poverty every year on account of health care bills that are unaffordable. It's one of the highest rates of poverty creation in the world. That has to be controlled," Krishna who holds a PhD in Government from Cornell University told IANS.
 
The second factor that Krishna holds responsible for the sustained poverty in India is the failure of the state. He said that there is relatively little that is being done to support people's movement out of poverty. While agreeing on the fact that we have "a number of impressive schemes and programmes" that serve as a source of succour, providing wage employment and subsidised rations and mid-day meals and so on, but maintained that these are only in the nature of "survival benefits".
 
"They help poor people get by from day-to-day, which is important and necessary. But these schemes and programs don't generate investible surpluses or send a child to college. Those who obtain these benefits remain near-poor," added Krishna, who has published five other books and more than 50 journal articles.
 
The final reason that Krishna presented for massive poverty in India has to do with "beliefs and values". He said that the beliefs harboured by the rich and well-to-do about the poor and the reasons for their poverty has no basis.
 
"For instance, many believe that people are poor because they don't work hard or are feckless or given to drink, and yes, there are some such individuals. But a wider search shows that the majority haven't become poor or remained poor because of character flaws," he shared.
 
The nature and depth of poverty is known to most Indians and the author regretted that very few, no matter how talented, are able to rise high from situations of poverty in India.
 
"Many smart young women and men who, given a chance, could have been star athletes or artists or business managers, have become vegetable vendors, delivery boys, and mazdoors (labourers). The ladder to higher opportunity, which these individuals encounter, has many broken rungs. Nearly 60 percent of the population has trouble accessing higher opportunity. Fixing the broken rungs in the ladder is necessary for social justice. It is essential for sustained economic development," Krishna added.
 
The author added that "the tragedy of India" is that it provides few viable opportunities to its teeming millions. Many talented children who grow up in faraway villages and city slums are not given the supports that all children need if they are to make superior achievements, he said.
 
"Tackling inequality of opportunity is essential so the country can grow faster, making better use of its human potential. Too many people remain unrepresented at the higher levels in diverse walks of life, as a result of which the country punches well below its weight in international competitions. India wins the fewest Olympic medals per million population of any country, lower by a factor of ten than the next-lowest country's score," he contended.
 
Krishna received an honorary doctorate from Uppsala University, Sweden in 2011; the Olaf Palme Visiting Professorship from the Swedish Research Council in 2007; the Dudley Seers Memorial Prize in 2005; and the Best Article Award of the American Political Science Association, Comparative Democratization Section in 2002. Before returning to academia, he spent 14 years with the Indian Administrative Service, managing diverse rural and urban development initiatives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In northeast India, water-management practices to deal with climate change

In a small village on the north bank of the Brahmaputra in Assam in northeast India, farmer Horen Nath stood gazing at his partially submerged paddy field. The floods had kept their annual date but mercifully, the farmer said, the waters have started receding. "The weather has become very strange of late. We always had ample rain,

Read more...

IMF cuts India's growth projection, but it still retains world's top spot

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) cut India's growth projections for this fiscal year to 7.3 per cent and for the next to 7.5 per cent on Monday, although the country will still retain i...

Read more...
Tweets about SAMonitor
SAM Facebook