After finger-wagging comments in New Delhi by a US sanctions official, Washington tried to sound somewhat conciliatory by saying the US is not seeking to change India's relationship with Russia, but wants it to use its leverage with Moscow to get the message against the invasion of Ukraine “loud and clear” through to President Vladimir Putin.

Hours before Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arrived in Delhi, United States Deputy National Security Advisor Daleep Singh, the chief architect of the sanctions imposed on Russia, said that there will be “consequences” to countries that “actively attempt to circumvent the sanctions”, according to The Indian Express. 

Singh said that the warming Russia-China relationship, which both sides had described as one with "no limits", had implications for India.

“No one should kid themselves — Russia is going to be the junior partner in this relationship with China. And the more leverage that China gains over Russia, the less favourable that is for India,” he said. “I don’t think anyone would believe that if China once again breached the Line of Actual Control, Russia would come running in India’s defence. And so that’s the context in which we really want the democracies across the world and specifically, the Quad to come together and voice your shared interests and your shared concerns about the velopments in Ukraine and the implications.”

Answering a reporter's question in Washington if the US had concerns about Lavrov's visit to New Delhi, State Department Spokesperson Ned Price said that some countries “by dint of their longstanding relationships with the Russian Federation, are going to have in some ways even more leverage than countries closer to us will”.

“Different countries are going to have their own relationship with the Russian Federation. It’s a fact of history; it’s a fact of geography. That is not something that we are seeking to change”, Price said.

“What we are seeking to do, whether it is in the context of India or other partners and allies around the world, is to do all we can to see to it that the international community is speaking in unison, speaking loudly against this unjustified, unprovoked, premeditated aggression, calling for an end to the violence, using the leverage that countries, including India, have to those ends,” he said.

“And that is all well and good. We understand that. What we are asking for, what we are calling for is that all countries use the leverage that they have to make sure that that message is coming across to Vladimir Putin loud and clear” he added.

Price side-stepped a question if the reported rupee-ruble trading arrangement between India and Russia would undermine sanctions.

“I would refer to our Indian partners when it comes to any such rupee-ruble conversion that may have been discussed,” he said.

The response of the State Department, which has to deal with the strategic concerns of the US, especially with China, has been at variance with the more narrow outlook of Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo who said that she was “deeply disappointed” with the reported rupee-ruble arrangement.

She said on Wednesday, “Now is the time to stand on the right side of history, and to stand with the United States and dozens of other countries standing up for freedom, democracy and sovereignty with the Ukrainian people, and not funding and fuelling and aiding President Putin’s war”.

Western allies of the US that buying energy on a far larger scale than India have not been criticised for “funding and fuelling” the invasion of Ukraine.

Moreover, India's Minister of State for Petroelum Rameshvar Teli infromed the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of Parliament, that the government did not have a “contract or proposal under consideration” for buying Russian oil in rupees.

In what is seen as a dig at fellow Quad member India, Australia's Trade Minister Dan Tehan, who was with Raimondo, said that democracies should work together “to keep the rules-based approach that we have had since the Second World War”.

Price was asked if India did not use its leverage, would that have a negative consequence for the Quad, the four-member Indo-Pacific group of India, the US, Japan and Australia.

He said that the Quad's core principles behind the idea of “a free and open Indo-Pacific” transcend any geographic region and “we have a global interest in a world order that is free, that is open, in which countries large and small play by the rules”.

“So it is not in our interest, it is not in Japan’s interest, it is not in Australia’s interest, or it is not in India’s interest to see flagrant examples of countries – whether in Europe, whether in the Indo-Pacific, whether anywhere in between – flagrant examples of countries flouting, violating that rules-based international order”, he added.

(SAM)